Ls1g

Your submission at Articles for creation: Partial-closed world assumption (January 20) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mortee was:

I'm sorry that your submission was waiting so long for review. There is a long backlog. I'm declining it for now mostly because I think there's an inaccuracy.

Your statement three has to be about Sarah Johnson, not Charles Ponzi. Ponzi definitely is an editor of Formal Logic (not an author - there's a mismatch between the table and the rest of the section on that point) but we know Johnson isn't because the editors of Formal Logic are known (completeness assumption) and she's not listed as one of them.

There will be a question about the notability of the PCWA too. Google hits aren't a reliable measure of anything, but "closed world assumption" and "open world assumption" have tens of thousands each, while "partial ..." and "partially ..." have 35 and 6 respectively, including the CWA and OWA Wikipedia pages. It makes sense to discuss completeness assumptions somewhere and I can see an argument for doing that with a new article rather than explaining the same thing twice. I can imagine a debate at articles for deletion that looked at that and ended with this turning into a subsection of open world assumption, though.

What would you think about structuring it that way for now (no AfC involved, you can edit the article directly) and splitting off a separate article if the literature develops so there's too much to say for an article section?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Partial-closed world assumption and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Partial-closed world assumption, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mortee (talk) 01:11, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

User:Mortee: Thanks for the notification and for spotting the technical inaccuracy. I'll fix this and recheck the whole article, then see whether to resubmit or merge. Off the top of my hat I think merging it is not ideal, because the present concept really stands in the middle between open- and closed-world assumption, thus would require replication at both ends, yet I'll reconsider this and check about notability. Cheers, Ls1g (talk) 22:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. I tend to agree about avoiding duplication. Perhaps the right route is to put in the new article, in your revised form, and leave it to be merged later if an argument about notability comes up. Mortee (talk) 22:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Partial-closed world assumption (April 11) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Davisonio was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Closed world assumption. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Partial-closed world assumption and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Partial-closed world assumption, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Craig Davison (talk) 15:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Ls1g! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Craig Davison (talk) 15:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic