LibertyHiller

Mackinaw Trail

Dear LibertyHiller, Your recent addition to Mackinaw City, Michigan was much appreciated by me -- I've raised this question elsewhere before a along time ago, and you are the first to have addressed it. Can you find a source? It would be stronger if you could. Happy editing and cheers. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 23:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC) Stan

Dear LibertyHiller, It sounds like a primary source. Take a look at John Jay, as I think it has a section that deals with primary sources. Then again, maybe I've got it wrong, as I've looked at so many articles, and they tend to blur. You might address your thoughts to User: Barek or User: Asher196, as they have a handle on a lot of good concepts that might apply. I've drive most of that road, so I'm well aware of what you speak. The problem is to find a source and a way to cite to it. Good luck. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 02:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Stan

Thanks for your work on Mackinaw City, the hidden link between M City and Saginaw is the sort of thing that this encyclopedia needs Bigturtle (talk) 18:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Wayne County, Ohio

As long as you have a reliable source that can be cited, be my guest and thanks. You might also want to contact the folks who worte the source I used and tell them of their error. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 20:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:You Only Move Twice

If we start giving leeway to "honest attempts at explaining those references," with no sources, then the article would quickly get out of hand and end up like this. As for your accusation of "your brute-force revert of minor changes", I saw a section that violated WP:NOR and went into too much detail and contained an incorrect part ("Marge tried to point out that the Broncos were consistent .500 performers" - No she didn't. She just said that there was nothing wrong with owning a NFL team). So, your accusation is baseless and just seems to be an unnecessary shot along the lines of "oh, you reverted my edit, you bastard!" Now, had you made changes to any other part of the article, then I would have left them. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 14:49, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Wow, what is with the nastiness? I have no problem with sourced cultural references. If you tried to add a sourced note about something else, I would not have reverted you. However, your note simply went into unnecessary detail that strayed too far from the topic of the article. Let's not forget: this is a general encyclopedia, not a fan site. It is not the purpose of the article to examine and explain every joke. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 16:54, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Macomb (surname) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Macomb (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Rodgers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Willow Run, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Martha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

USRC Bibb (1843), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 14:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gorget patches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wilhelmine Germany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Air Transport Command, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Midland and Scott Field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Corps may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• logistic elements. The Army, meanwhile, would use corps-level headquarters during the [Vietnam War]], but using the name of "Field Force," to avoid confusion with the [[Army of the Republic of
• professional groups...based on similarity of military roles, customs and traditions." ''CFAO 2-10)''<ref>http://www.admfincs.forces.gc.ca/admfincs/subjects/cfao/002-10_e.asp</ref> However, the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:02, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Third Army Corps (Spanish-American War)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Third Army Corps (Spanish-American War), LibertyHiller!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louisiana (New France), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Missouri Valley and Treaty of Fontainebleau. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Illinois Country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Missouri Valley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LibertyHiller. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LibertyHiller. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LibertyHiller. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)