Leo.Johnes

Speedy deletion nomination of Greenteg edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Leo.Johnes,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Greenteg for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I appreciate that you may not have intended to advertise this product, but you have not abided by the neutral point of view policy of wikipedia. Please read the guidelines and you may be able to rewrite the article so that it complies. Deb (talk) 17:50, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:GreenTEG has a new comment edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:GreenTEG. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:35, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: GreenTEG (September 17) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would not resubmit as it's simply too soon considering the company is still only about 7 years-old, and there's still not enough to actually establish independent notability and substance.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GreenTEG and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 18:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:GreenTEG edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Leo.Johnes. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "GreenTEG".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic