Welcome!

Hello, LeastCommonMultiple, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Dr. Roland Santos, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Falcon8765 (talk) 05:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of "Dr. Roland Santos"

edit
 

A page you created, Dr. Roland Santos, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk) 05:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it meets said criteria. He is a professor I had for a class. He is a genius. I repeat, HE IS A GENIUS.--LeastCommonMultiple (talk) 05:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of "Matchuchu"

edit
 

A page you created, Matchuchu, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk) 05:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it meets that criteria. It is an article about something very near and dear to my heart.--LeastCommonMultiple (talk) 05:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

April 2010

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Falcon8765 (talk) 05:36, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Grand Théâtre de Genève. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Falcon8765 (talk) 05:38, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LeastCommonMultiple (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok, so I am really really drunk right now, and I had a bet with my buddy that I could get myself blocked on Wikipedia within fifteen minutes (I think I won, but I'm going to have to check the stopwatch). Anyway, come the morning, I won't be drunk anymore, and I promise you this stuff won't continue to happen, so if you could please unblock my account, even if you wait until tomorrow to do it, like I said, I am really drunk right now and just having a few drunken laughs.

Decline reason:

Congratulations on winning your bet. We are happy to make sure it stays won. Wikipedia is not a game.  Sandstein  07:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is anyone out there reviewing this unblock request please, I'm really drunk, please review it.--LeastCommonMultiple (talk) 05:54, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LeastCommonMultiple (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

unblock me now, or I shall be very angry you pompous ass. Have you never gotten drunk before? Just lift the fucking block and don't be such a fucking chump

Decline reason:

This is an encyclopedia, not a game or a bet. Speaking of which - it took more than 15 minutes: you lose. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:56, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by e-mailing unblock-en-l, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.