Laurens Midnite

February 2019

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Kate Beckinsale, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Meters (talk) 10:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue with these edits you'll quickly find yourself blocked from editing. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 15:56, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laurens Midnite (February 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 13:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Laurens Midnite! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 13:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Beckinsale, you may be blocked from editing. XAnio (talk) 15:56, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Laurens Midnite

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Laurens Midnite, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Meters (talk) 21:32, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Can I ask you, why you want to delete a page of Laurens Midnite? Who is a real artist. And completely verified.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurens Midnite (talk • contribs) 10:16, February 4, 2019 (UTC)

Please indent (one : per tab) and sign (use ~~~~ ) your posts.

It has already been deleted as a hoax, because you are falsely claiming to be married to a celebrity. That is a WP:BLP violation. As I previously told you, Stop claiming you are married to her. Do not create draft articles that claim you are married.

Even if you had not made that claim in the draft it would not have been acceptable as an article. Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself. An article that consists of nothing but links to your online media is not acceptable. An article needs independent reliable sources to show the subject's notability. See WP:RS. If the subject is not notable there is no need for an article. See WP:N and WP:BIO. And don't write articles about yourself. See WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIOG. Meters (talk) 21:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Beckinsale. Stop claiming you are married to her. Do not create draft articles that claim you are married. Meters (talk) 21:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Laurens Midnite

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Laurens Midnite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mori Calliope fan talk 23:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Regarding your contested deletions: You need reliable sources for your article; being a verified artist does not necessarily mean you are notable. Also, IMDb is not a reliable source. Mori Calliope fan talk 00:10, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 01:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Wow, this is not allowed, I would Love to talk to your legal department about this. Laurens Midnite (talk) 04:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Laurens Midnite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Would have loved some normal conversation, I Laurens Midnite as the artist am a real person and artist, where I am not getting the block, missed the parts of the legal threats, worry my fault for that, but why is there no communication possible?, I have read the articles G10 and A7, what except for more information cannot be the reason, it was and is serious to make a page that meets the requirements, from you at Wikipedia it felt more as an attack and blocking an artist out, the neutral part I was talking about, I am serious making an article page here on Wikipedia, would Love just to be able to that, find it a bit much your action Wikipedia to I, just normal communication would have been fineLaurens Midnite (talk) 05:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you want normal conversation, we can have that now. You are blocked for making legal threats; you made an additional threat after being blocked(above). You must unequivocally withdraw any and all legal threats in order to be unblocked. Furthermore, you seem to be creating a hoax article, which is not permitted. You will also have to describe what constructive contributions you want to make towards building this encyclopedia of human knowledge in order to be unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As adding I thought I did not directly do that, a legal threat, but sorry my fault for that, did miss that a bit. Pointed only out, what you all do there at Wikipedia, Neutrality, felt and looked like attacked as an artist, a personal thing, instead of that it had to do with presented articles that I checked. For meeting the requirements, I am serious about that, only a chance to at least finish a page already with all the information. Laurens Midnite (talk) 05:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

As asked, hereby I 'unequivocally withdraw any and all legal threats' in order to be unblocked.

Except for I understand why it is typed liked that, find a threat a bit much to say like that, that is all.

As a reaction upon the reply. It is not a hoax article, Laurens Midnite, that is I, I am really an artist, have worked next to in Film and Writing, as a DJ and Producer under Aliases with quite a bit of gigs bookings through time and history.

Next to having released work and history, will be in the upcoming time, this year and upcoming years, Film work from I in production. On IMDb for example some of my work is already there, verified by passport check and everything.

So real, a real person, a real artist, this is just my artist name.

Have checked the articles for information needed and before adding creating the article, I will cross check everything with more information. Including history connect in entertainment industry work. With released work and some extra things, that are done in the last moments in time. But will cross check first everything if when it meets the requirements. Adding value of read. Laurens Midnite (talk) 09:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

You must make another unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 12:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

• Note to any reviewing administrator: I should have blocked this user on two bases, for the legal threat and as a promotion-only user. It's fairly obvious that is his only purpose in being here. Even if the user clearly retracts the legal threat, he should not be unblocked, although the block log could be amended to clarify the reason he remains blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

I just apologized about the legal threat. Can I at least have a normal conversation with you at Wikipedia?

I just said I hereby 'unequivocally withdraw any and all legal threats' to be unblocked. That is how I should type it right? Thought that was the correct way to say it.

Find this quite hostile, for especially what I typed.

I am not a promotion only user, every artist page on here is about the artist and their work. How can I be then a promotion only user? Do not understand if when that is the function of a person article, history, biography, that is about the work in the connected entertainment industry. Through timeband now here in this moment in time. Where it all came to and lead to.

I have read multiple articles on Wikipedia and with sources and references that is what all is in there.

Work, nominations, Awards, history, biography, connection to it, growing up through life, connection entertainment industry, contests, er cetera. Laurens Midnite (talk) 16:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

And what do you have to say about your multiple false claims to be married to Kate Beckinsale? Meters (talk) 19:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

What does anything have to do with what you ask now, to do with the unblock request for this reason? For the reason above?

Everything what is need to know, can just be found online in terms of information and sources. Missing the point of the question for the unblock of the reason mentioned above.

I answered the question and message of your colleague, did what was correct to do. And answered it as I should do in formality in the way your colleague at Wikipedia mentioned.

Laurens Midnite (talk) 00:04, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

You made multiple unsourced and apparently false claims to be married to Kate Beckinsale. Those were WP:BLP violations, and aside from your talk page, those are the only extant edits in your history. I could find no evidence of such a marriage at the time, and I can find no reliable sources to support the claim now (your social media accounts are not reliable sources). Any admin contemplating unblocking you should be aware of that history, regardless of why you are blocked. Meters (talk) 08:33, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Meters, you are now doing something wrong to I as a person and are making it personal.

First that has nothing to do with this case, for the unblock request for this reason? You are making it personal to I.

Next to that, I doubt that you really checked all socials regarding the subject you are talking about.

You Meters are talking about something that has no connection, nothing to do, with reason above and now in time.

I have read your Wikipedia rules and things and the last sentence including making it personal to I, goes against where Wikipedia stands for.

That what you are talking about Meters has nothing to do with the reason above, the case in question and the unblock request.

I am an artist, a real person, a real artist. It is about that and my work, history connected to the entertainment industry and all the rest connected to my work, et cetera.

As I said before, 'I answered the question and message of your colleague, did what was correct to do. And answered it as I should do in formality in the way your colleague at Wikipedia mentioned'. Laurens Midnite (talk) 11:37, 31 July 2022 (UTC)