Welcome! edit

Hello, LIVE Guy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Yann (talk) 16:41, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Primetime Engineering Emmy Awards for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Primetime Engineering Emmy Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primetime Engineering Emmy Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 15:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


Hello I am LIVE Guy. I am about to be named a Primetime Emmy Engineering winner the week of Sept 28. So I am a credible source. I am concerned that the Primetime Emmy Engineering Award Wikipedia article is being marked this way. The awards exist, and the information is utterly accurate.

Here are links to the last thee Primetime Emmy Engineering Award announcements, all releases from the Television Academy:

http://www.emmys.com/news/press-releases/honorees-announced-66th-primetime-emmy-engineering-awards

http://www.emmys.com/news/press-releases/winners-announced-65th-primetime-emmy-engineering-awards

http://www.emmys.com/news/awards-news/olivia-munn-hosts-64th-primetime-emmy-engineering-awards

and you will see that the information I have supplied is accurate.

The rest of the information I received from John Leverence, Senior Vice-President for Awards of the Television Academy. The information is in a document which I am happy to supply to Wikipedia, if I knew how. You are free to contact Mr. Leverence at the Television Academy. He is aware of me and of the Wiki article I have been creating.

In regards to creating lots of reference links and so on, I am sorry, but this will take time. It took me 8 hours to create this page already, and I find much of the "Wiki method" to be rather impenetrable in regards to linking and so on.

LIVE Guy (talk) 17:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


Also I noticed a comment by JHamo that the article should be included simply in Prime Time Emmy. I strongly disagree. First, notice that the Creative Arts category for Primetime Emmy has its own web page already. Second, the Engineering Emmys really are a separate category. For example, they are not presented at the televised prime time emmy ceremony. They are not televised but are extremely prestigious. Like the Creative Arts Primetime Emmys, they have their own separate ceremony. The argument to delete is completely unfounded.

LIVE Guy (talk) 17:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


Just some more rationale for this web page that I created:

- this is one of the most important Engineering awards in the world, and there is not even a Wikipedia page devoted to it - The Technology and Engineering Awards for the other Emmy - granting organization (NATAS) has its own very similar web page as the one I created: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_%26_Engineering_Emmy_Award. These are NOT the same awards as the Primetime Emmy Engineering Awards, and NATAS is NOT the same organization as the Television Academy.

Thanks,

LIVE Guy (talk) 21:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


I have added some references to the last three Primetime Emmy Engineering Award announcements at the end.

LIVE Guy (talk) 22:11, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have added more references to prior Primetime Emmy Engineering Awards. These help make clear the following:

(1) The Primetime Emmy Engineering Awards are NOT part of the Primetime Emmys Ceremony. They are ANNOUNCED separately, have a separate ceremony, reach completely different audiences, and are not publicized at all together by the Television Academy (2) There are plenty of citations for the article now pointing to the most recent awards and as far back as the 50th ceremony in 1998. I do not have the energy to find a citation for all of the almost 40 award announcements or ceremonies. (3) However all the data comes direction from the Awards people at the Television Academy who are aware that I am creating this Wikipedia page.

LIVE Guy (talk) 23:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve IEEE Fourier Award for Signal Processing edit

Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. LIVE Guy, thanks for creating IEEE Fourier Award for Signal Processing!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Independent references not from the IEEE or recipients should be used to show notability

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Edwin H. Land Medal for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edwin H. Land Medal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin H. Land Medal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you! edit

 

hi LIVE Guy, just thought you might like a kitten as every talkpage needs a "furry guy" 

Coolabahapple (talk) 00:19, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply