Kyoumahououin09

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Kyoumahououin09, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much for exdenting such a warm welcome and the cookies.Kyoumahououin09 (talk) 16:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Kyoumahououin09, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 13:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Puneet Kumar influencer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Puneet Kumar influencer.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Cheers for letting me know as I'm still learning the ropes. Kyoumahououin09 (talk) 19:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of GFS Builders & Developers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GFS Builders & Developers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

GFS Builders & Developers moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to GFS Builders & Developers. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. – The Grid (talk) 15:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much for sharing your input. I will keep on working on the page.Kyoumahououin09 (talk) 11:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Bbb23 (talk) 14:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kyoumahououin09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I hope this message finds you well. I want to assure you that I am committed to maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia and have never participated in any form of paid editing. My contributions are driven by a genuine passion for sharing accurate and unbiased information with the community. If there are specific edits or instances that have raised suspicions, please feel free to point them out, and I would be more than willing to provide additional context or clarification. I appreciate your dedication to upholding the standards of this platform and welcome the opportunity to address any concerns you may have. I've looked over Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kyoumahououin09 and I'm baffled by the reasonings for my block. First of all, I got to know about 'Chuck Gallaghar' through an ethics workshop and looked him up on Wiki. Secondly, I use "copyedit" as a basic term for only making changes in the content of a page. I like being consistent with the type of contributions I make, I didn't know you were supposed to change it up every time. And I created my account in September, so what? I don't deserve to be punished because I landed on a page some jokers tried to control. I'm taken aback for being called the mastermind(in a good way) but I don't have any intention to be the leader of a hyena pack. I have been respectful regarding my contributions and wish to remain so. Kyoumahououin09 (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I think you wrote the first half of your request with a bot or AI so I was tempted to summarily decline this- but I am declining it anyway; I think you are a paid editor(the stated reason for the block) and a sock or meat puppet. Until you are honest about these things, there is no pathway forward. 331dot (talk) 00:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kyoumahououin09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There is nothing to come clean about. I mean I wish I was paid something but I wasn't. It even states in your investigation that I'm using an older browser. That is not by choice at all. My account is blocked just because 'it might be so' or 'you think.' I do not think this is fair. Do my edits and contributions don't have a say. Kyoumahououin09 (talk) 8:09 am, 21 December 2023, Thursday (22 days ago) (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, I am are unable to unblock you at this time. Recommend waiting at least six months before you again request unblocking. (You should not evade your block by editing the English language Wikipedia from a different account or while not logged in during this time. It would reset the six month timer.) It would work in your favor for you to constructively edit a different Wikipedia or Wikimedia project during this time, for at least six months and at least 500 edits. You will then need to concisely and clearly tell how your editing merited a block, what you would do different, and what constructive edits you would make. A list of Wikimedia projects can be found at META:List_of_Wikipedias . Before again requesting unblocking, please read the Guide to Appealing Blocks Thanks.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:GFS logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GFS logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Puneet Kumar (influencer)

The article Puneet Kumar (influencer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable social media influencer who only receives run-of-the-mill media coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)