KrellOysteer101

Your submission at Articles for creation: TOMOS (god and mythological creature (November 21)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Qcne (talk) 20:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, KrellOysteer101! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 20:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:TOMOS (god and mythological creature

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:TOMOS (god and mythological creature, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Qcne (talk) 20:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

@Qcne Is that what you said to Jesus? KrellOysteer101 (talk) 10:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

what? Qcne (talk) 11:00, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

@Qcne Is that what you said to Christians when they filed for a Wikipedia page? KrellOysteer101 (talk) 11:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

no idea what you're talking about. Qcne (talk) 11:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

@Qcne Qcne, while I respect your status as a distinguished Wikipedia editor, I do not think that your conservative, or perhaps even authoritarian views about religion, are to be taken seriously in today's society KrellOysteer101 (talk) 17:38, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Qcne (talk) 17:38, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Calling a reputable religion a "hoax" is extremely offensive, and may even get you banned from the platform. KrellOysteer101 (talk) 17:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Qcne (talk) 17:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)