Kmj47

Your submission at Articles for creation: Callichimaera has been accepted

Callichimaera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 01:32, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Microtenthes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Microtenthes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microtenthes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:47, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Scalopognathus moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Scalopognathus, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 13:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Santacruzgnathus

Hi, I've moved Santacruzgnathus to draftspace, as it is very bare-bones and needs more work. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 22:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scalopognathus has been accepted

Scalopognathus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Edward-Woodrow (talk) 19:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nice job on Scalopognathus! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Callichimaera image permission

Hello, as I saw you uploaded images of this taxa, but it looks like paper[1] is licensed as "Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC)", which is not suitable for upload to Commons. You have written "Replacing fan art with anatomically correct depiction of Callichimaera from press release, as approved by the authors of the original publication.", but are there any evidence for that? Basically without proof of that, it us not acceptable to post images like these on Commons. I will add a copyvio tag and will be deleted, if you really got permission from authors, upload manually as permissioned image. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 14:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

If "as approved by the authors" just mean that Creative Commons licence, images have to be deleted since Non-Commercial licence is unusable in Wikipedia. If that means you personally contacted authors and got permission, it is necessary to tell about that to operators of Commons via e-mail. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 15:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I'm the author of the paper and the creator of the wikipage. You have my permission.