Kdickson

Your edits on the Toronto Port Authority page seem to be mostly advertising for the TPA and the port instread of a Neutral Point of View of the TPA. To remove all mention of Miller's campaign indicates that you are using Wikipedia to push your POV and not interested in an encyclopedic article. Please do not do this again. I don't mind corrections of factual errors but not shameless boosterism. Dabbler 16:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

I have responded to your comments on my Talk page. See User talk:Dabbler Dabbler 17:57, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Please be aware of Wikipedia's three revert rule. You have violated this at Toronto Port Authority. Please desist. Thank you. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 05:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Failure to understand the Wikipedia terms of use

... it's also against wikipedia policy for a person working for or representing an organization to edit their own work. Since your an active Toronto Port Authority employee - you are violating Wikipedia rules by editing the TPA page. Thank you. I'm critical, because you don't add anything to the TPA page, just remove from it. Wikipedia isn't a marketing site, it's a factual site. And all sides need to be represented. Thank you. themepark.

See my response on the Toronto Port Authority discussion page Kdickson 18:53, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Stop the whitewashing

Lead guidelines require a summary of the sections of an article. Just because you guys at TPA may not like it is not a reason to remove the summary. And give it up on the Airport! It IS commonly known as the Island Airport. rAlaney2k (talk) 13:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Toronto Port Authority

I have posted notices on WT:TO and WT:CANADA for other editors to review the TPA article. Also, I have posted notes on editors who have worked on the article in the past. I have not gotten any replies on the Talk page for the TPA article. I am willing and prepared to work with you on the format and content of the article. I want to make this work. I have made a large comment on the Talk:Toronto Port Authority page and I'd like your feedback. I think it would be pointless to start reverting when the lock comes off. The admin would then put a lock on for a longer period. Alaney2k (talk) 15:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)