Your submission at Articles for creation: Starman and Three Friends (July 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SunDawn was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Kadoon2013! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corey Blaster (August 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Shelovesneo was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No significance of importance whatsoever, deleted on the Simple English site and fails WP:FICTION.
shelovesneo (talk) 03:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Starman and Three Friends (August 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 16:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Starman (Starman and Three Friends)

edit
 

The article Starman (Starman and Three Friends) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable character from a non-notable series. Nothing to redirect to.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schminnte (talk contribs) 20:11, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Starman and Three Friends moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Starman and Three Friends. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it is clearly not finished and ready for publication. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please do not attempt to publish something that is self-evidently not ready; most of the sections simply read 'TBA', and there isn't a single source cited. This has been declined several times at AfC, so it should have been quite obvious that it wasn't up to required standards. If you move this back into the main space, it will almost certainly be deleted. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlos Pittsburgh (September 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 13:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlos Pittsburgh (September 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 15:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Starman and Three Friends

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Starman and Three Friends, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 17:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Carlos Pittsburgh

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Carlos Pittsburgh, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Starman and Three Friends

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Starman and Three Friends, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:24, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 17:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Starman (Starman and Three Friends)

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Starman (Starman and Three Friends), is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:37, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Corey Blaster

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Corey Blaster, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply