HeartBD2K Jspolson
Jspolson, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi Jspolson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 18:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC) |
External links
editHi. Thanks for your contributions to Gene Wiki articles: I am however starting to becoming concerned about the text you are adding to an increasing number of articles that take the form:
The XXXXX gene encodes a YYYY kDa protein that is composed of ZZZZ amino acids; n peptides have been observed through mass spectrometry data.[1][2]
References
- ^ Zong NC, Li H, Li H, Lam MP, Jimenez RC, Kim CS, Deng N, Kim AK, Choi JH, Zelaya I, Liem D, Meyer D, Odeberg J, Fang C, Lu HJ, Xu T, Weiss J, Duan H, Uhlen M, Yates JR, Apweiler R, Ge J, Hermjakob H, Ping P (Oct 2013). "Integration of cardiac proteome biology and medicine by a specialized knowledgebase". Circulation Research. 113 (9): 1043–53. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301151. PMC 4076475. PMID 23965338.
- ^ "Long-chain-fatty-acid--CoA ligase 6". Cardiac Organellar Protein Atlas Knowledgebase (COPaKB).
This is generating a large number of citations to one particular article (PMID 23965338) and one particular external site (heartproteome.org). This suggests to me that you may have a conflict of interest. These links are redundant to the information contained in the {{GNF_Protein_box}} already contained in these articles. Hence I question their value. Before adding any additional links to these two sources, you need to justify these addition either here or here. Thanks. Boghog (talk) 19:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you Boghog for pointing that out. Where is the peptide information contained within the {{GNF_Protein_box}}? I realize now that the information that was put in before the aforementioned sentence regarding the chromosomal location, etc. is redundant, but I wasn't able to find the protein information in the box myself.Jspolson (talk) 21:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (PDPR) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating PDPR, HeartBD2K Jspolson!
Wikipedia editor Roches just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Reviewed, looks good. You may wish to include the most important details of structure and function in the opening paragraph. I did not place a tag on the article asking you to expand the lead para, so it's entirely up to you if you wish to do this.
To reply, leave a comment on Roches's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Malate dehydrogenase
editHi. The Malate dehydrogenase article is about the family of enzymes that includes both MDH1 and MDH2. If you have specific information about MDH1, please add it to that article instead of the family article. Please also note that I have also restored the Aconitase to its original state and moved the material that you added to this article to ACO2. The {{infobox enzyme}} and {{infobox protein family}} templates also contains useful information and should not be deleted. Thanks. Boghog (talk) 22:56, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the clarification. Some of the language on the Malate dehydrogenase page refers to MDH1, including the interactive pathway map, and there was no MDH1 page prior; because of this, I appreciate the creation of the MDH1 page so as to better distinguish information about the two isoforms. It seems that the MDH family page contains references to studies of mitochondrial MDH; is it still appropriate to keep the corresponding information on this page, or would it be best to move it over to MDH2? Thank you for your guidance. HeartBD2K Jspolson (talk) 23:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ACAD10, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.rprotein.com/protein/ACAD10.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of GCAT, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.phosphosite.org/proteinAction.do?id=17952&showAllSites=true.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:06, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Copyright Concern
editCan you verify that content like this edit [1] from this publisher [2] are acceptible. It seem okay, but copyvios are serious matter. Thanks. Just include my username and I'll be notified of your response.--Lucas559 (talk) 18:41, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
ANI
edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. kashmiri TALK 19:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Infobox gene
editHey, nice work! It would be great if you could start using the new info gene template when you create a new article. See for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LACTB2&oldid=702009964 . This should be a lot less work for you and you can be sure that the contents will be updated automatically by the bots and people editing the structured data on wikidata. Any questions, just 'talk' me. --Benjamin Good (talk) 22:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)