Jovanatomin

Welcome!

Hello, Jovanatomin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:32, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Deepak Chopra

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Deepak Chopra. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 16:04, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions for pages regarding complementary and alternative medicine

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.  Bishonen | talk 17:24, 25 March 2018 (UTC).

Discretionary sanctions for pages regarding biographies of living people

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.  Bishonen | talk 17:24, 25 March 2018 (UTC).

March 2018

Hello, Jovanatomin. Moving the summary of criticism of Deepak Chopra out of the lead section and down to an inconspicuous separate "criticism" section is pretty tendentious, and describing the move in the edit summary as "making paragraphs easier" is pretty misleading. Compare also WP:NOCRIT. Instead of insisting on the change by WP:edit warring, please take your proposed change to the talkpage for discussion. Do not persist in simply reverting. Bishonen | talk 17:26, 25 March 2018 (UTC).

BTW, I don't understand your changes back and forth here and here. What were you trying to achieve with them? Might it have been for the purpose of gaining autoconfirmed status so that you could edit Deepak Chopra? Please don't game our rules. Bishonen | talk 17:41, 25 March 2018 (UTC).

Well, never mind answering that: I have just counted the trivial edits you made after User:Omkar khalipe's request was declined at Talk:Deepak Chopra, and before you went and made the edit: you made exactly the ten trivial edits required for autoconfirmed, and then started edit warring at the article. You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock of Omkar khalipe per WP:DUCK. Bishonen | talk 18:16, 25 March 2018 (UTC).