Johnsmit2340987
Welcome!
editHi Johnsmit2340987! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:01, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
edit
Hello, I'm Soetermans. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:39, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
February 2024
editHello, It seems that you have been repeatedly vandalizing articles related to Pakistan especially the content related to 2019 India–Pakistan border skirmishes. If you continue to vandalize in the future, you shall be reported which could lead to a permanent block from editing. So, please refrain from doing such edits again. Regards An Asphalt (talk) 08:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, You are spreading misinformation and propaganda. The sources you mentioned do not conform the claims you made. if you continue to vandalise without providing reliable sources for claims you made, You will be reported. Johnsmit2340987 (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ZLEA T\C 20:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
edit
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — Newslinger talk 08:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
edit Hi Johnsmit2340987! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Bhagwa Love Trap conspiracy theory that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 08:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)