User talk:John B123/Archive 25

Archive 20

←

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

Archive 26

Archive 27

→

Archive 30

Memories

Hi John! Regarding the Memories film article, how do you think I can better improve it so that it meets the notability criteria? I believe that the sources I have added are indeed reliable and independent of the subject. What other information, if added, do you think would lend it the notability required for a film article? Thanks! — JosephJames 14:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Donaldd23 Hey Donald! Could you help out as well? — JosephJames 14:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

The criteria of WP:NFF needs to be fulfilled for the film to pass notability requirements. If not, it should be moved to draft and kept their until release, then it will have to pass WP:NFILM to be included on Wikipedia. If WP:NFF cannot be fulfilled, and it isn't moved to draft, it will more than likely be deleted for now. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:39, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

@Donaldd23:If you don't mind, could you tell which criteria of NFF is not fulfilled? The film has finished its principal photography and all the references I have added to the article are from reliable, reputed newspapers and independent from the subject. As I asked earlier, what other information, if any added, do you think would lend it the notability required for a film article? Would a brief plot summary and information regarding the marketing of the film maybe help its cause? — JosephJames 14:50, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Joseph, per WP:NFF, the production of the film needs to be notable. As far as I can see the coverage is the routine type you would have for any film. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:22, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi John. I am sorry but I am still unclear on how does the production of a film become notable? What is the difference between Memories and something like say Malaysia to Amnesia, a stub of a recent Tamil-language film or Third World Boys, another stub of an upcoming film? — JosephJames 15:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Malaysia to Amnesia is released and has 2 reviews, which passes WP:NFILM. Third World Boys fails WP:NFF and should also be deleted or moved to draft. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:44, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Hi Joseph, I agree Third World Boys shows no notability so have tagged it accordingly. See Mission: Impossible 7 as an example of how films are notable during production. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:47, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for that example John. It was certainly informative. But would you say that an earlier version of the MI7 article like this would pass the notability criteria? This version was left as it is for some fifteen days before another edit was made. I am sorry for keeping on asking questions, but it is so that I can choose topics for future articles better. Thanks! — JosephJames 15:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

​ No it didn't but it was in draft space at that time so wouldn't have been tagged. The article was subsequently declined at WP:AfC[1] before the filming became notable. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Okay, that definitely makes sense. But I still feel that there are still a lot of articles I found for upcoming films that are about the same as the one I made for Memories such as Tuesday, Memory, Cirkus, Men, F. I. R., Angel, Jail, Garjanai, 8, Garuda, Enemy etc, many of them being upcoming Tamil films. I am not asking you to go by all of them on a case by case basis, but it maybe feels a bit disappointing to me that these articles remain while Memories had been tagged for deletion in less than an hour. What do you think about it? — JosephJames 17:15, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

​ I looked at a couple of the films at random, Jail and Garjanai, both of which are now released (Jail in 2019). Whilst I can understand your frustration, these seem to be older articles that have slipped through the net. New page patrolling is now stronger than it used to be, and hopefully now more consistant. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Okay I see, but what about articles like Men, Memory and Tuesday which were created in Match, April and May of 2021 respectively, and are still standing? It is sad that only certain articles are being kept to higher standards. Either way, I have attempted to add new info on plot, production and marketing for Memories and attempted to remove the deletion tag. Please feel free to add it back if you find it unsatisfactory. @Donaldd23: I hope you check out the new version of the article as well. Also, maybe isn't it better to wait for the film to release so that two reviews can be added for it to pass WP:NFILM rather than deleting it? This is just a query, I hope you don't take it the wrong way.

Thank you both for your inputs! — JosephJames 18:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

​ It could be argued that Men's production was notable with Scott Rudin's removal as producer. Memory was moved from draft to mainspace by an autopatroled user so never went through new page patrol. I agree the last 2 are unlikely to meet WP:NFF. --John B123 (talk) 18:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification John! Could you please check the new version of Memories? Please add back the deletion tag if you still feel it is not good enough. Thanks! — JosephJames 19:07, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

JosephJames I do patrol new film article that was created to see if they meet the notability threshold, so that is why the ones you are pointing out haven't been singled out and "kept to higher standards. But, now that you have pointed them out I will certainly see if they meet notability. The way I come across these films is by patrolling pages that have been tagged with notability issues. If I see them, I do a WP:BEFORE to see if they can pass WP:NFILM. If so, I delete the notability tag. If not, I PROD them, or send them to AfD for a more broad discussion. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:11, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

You are doing great work Donaldd23! I hope you check out the new revision of Memories I did and see if it has got any better right now. Thanks! — JosephJames 19:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

​ A WP:PROD is an unopposed deletion. Once somebody has opposed the deletion, by removing the tag, it can't be re-added. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 20:04, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

2027 in sports nominated for deletion

I tried to explain in my edit summary, but accidentally hit published and this was the result. The reason I contest to the deletion of BOTH 2027 in sports and 2032 in sports is because, it's the same thing as all the other articles, 2034 in sports, etc. It isn't crystalball because these competitions are confirmed to happen (such as 2027 Rugby World Cup). Mwiqdoh (talk) 01:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

@Mwiqdoh: I'm sure in 2018 you'd have made the same claim that the 2020 Olympics would take place in 2020. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 12:09, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: There is no issue with it being postponed to the next year, as you just add postponed to a date in italics (see 2021 in sports) Mwiqdoh (talk) 22:59, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Malgrange-Zerner theorem

you marked Malgrange-Zerner theorem for lack of citations. One of the two references that this article contains is called "generalization of Malgrange-Zerner theorem", and it contains the statement of the theorem. Can you be a bit more specific which statements in the article need citations and just mark those and not the whole article? PhysicsAboveAll (talk) 04:41, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi PhysicsAboveAll, only the history section of the article is reverenced. The rest of the article needs references. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:43, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi John B123 Perhaps it was not clear but refs in the History section also contain proof and formulations of the theorem. I made this now explicit and added another reference. I think this article now contains a typical amount of references expected from an article about a mathematics theorem, so I removed the tag. If you are unhappy about some particular statement which needs to be referenced, please mark that statement (assuming that you are a mathematician). Regards.-- PhysicsAboveAll (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi PhysicsAboveAll, that looks fine now. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:51, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

2001 NAPA Auto Parts 300

Hi John. I'm fairly new to editing Wikipedia and adding sources is probably the bit I struggle with the most. I will keep editing the page and try and put in some other sources too. Cheers. NASCARDavid (talk) 17:11, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi NASCARDavid, Help:Referencing for beginners might help. Let me know when you've added some more references and I'll have another look. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:17, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Asking about notably

Is not enough reference to be review Muhammad Mehedi Hasan? What must I do to remove the temple of top the article? Saif SC 2016 (talk) 18:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Saif SC 2016, the article needs to meet the requirements of WP:JOURNALIST. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Article for review

Hello, firstly I would to appreciate your contributions, its great and you make Wiki amazing.

So in January I created Mudiwa Hood article, he is a prominent artists from Zimbabwe with the most awards here so I thought let me research and write about him in the encyclopedia. However on the contributors moved the article from mainspace for several concerns, Draft:Mudiwa Hood.

Over the past months on and off I managed to improve the article. I worked it to avoid WP:CITEKILL, proved more to show that Mudiwa Hood meets WP:NMUSIC and also removed other less important citations to ensure there is no WP:BOMBARD as suggested before.

Properly arranged important awards and removed less important. Also worked on the tone of article in its presentation as an encyclopedia page.

I think the article is better and ready for mainspace so can you kindly look in to it for a possible review.

Thank you, kind regards

Zvandofarira2 (talk) 04:28, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

And also

I also added on to the Discography as required in WP:NMUSIC because the first time I had not thoroughly researched.

Zvandofarira2 (talk) 04:34, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Zvandofarira2, this isn't a subject I know a lot about so I'm not in a position to be able to review it, sorry. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Request

Boss good morning. I have created another one 2021–22 Rahmatganj MFS season. Please beginning to review? Love and regard forever. III69 (talk) 09:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi III69, I see the page has been nominated for deletion. Although you have provided 11 references, they refer to the 2021 not the 2012/22 season. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

So plan? III69 (talk) 10:19, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi III69, you need to add some references relating to Rahmatganj in the 2021/2 season. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello evening brother. Sorry for bothering you. Could you review my one of season article name [[2020-21 Dhaka Abahani Limited season. Have a good health. Be aware from COVID 19. Much regard. III69 (talk) 18:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello evening brother. Sorry for bothering you. Could you review my one of season article name [[2020-21 Dhaka Abahani Limited season. Have a good health. Be aware from COVID 19. Much regard. III69 (talk) 18:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi III69, 2020–21 Abahani Limited Dhaka season? It looks fine. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:39, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

norton 650ss

Could you take a look at the content and syntax with wikilink of the 'Development' section which implies in the fourth paragraph the 600ss had downdraught carbs. I had to check as it's been a long time! Thx.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 01:20, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Rocknrollmancer, you're right, the 99SS didn't have the downdraught head. Not sure the 99SS was a development of the Manxman either, although it did use the same cam, the head was based on the 88 Domiracer head used at the IOM. There's several other parts of the article that need changing too; Bracebridge Street closed in 1963 so most of the production was at Woolwich/Plumstead, the slimline frame was introduced 2 years before not as implied for the 650SS, etc.

There was also a single carb version, the 650 Standard, in 62/63 that isn't mentioned. I was going to create an article for the Manxman and then update the 650SS article. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Thx - I have a dated advert for the 'new' slimline frame saved somewhere on my old computer. I was also uncomfortable in seeing the works F750 fairings were produced by Avon, considering they went bust by 1970. The main man went it alone with the help of his friends, the Rickman Brothers, at their premises post-Avon, producing their continuing requirements, then moved on allowing their own staff to continue production, then he produced a new range for Paul Dunstall by 1973. Writing this from memory but helped Ken Craven out after a fire circa 1976, and by 1979 was producing caravans - Bessacar. rgds--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 22:15, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Rocknrollmancer, I know little of Avon's history. I thought they were still going in the early/mid 70s, when I worked at Pride and Clarkes in Brixton in 74 they were still selling Avon fairings, but possibly they were old stock. Looking on line didn't help. This article[2] says Avon, or Michenall’s Reinforced Plastics, continued until the mid-80s. Confusingly the article, which is dated 2014, says 'Today the company employs about 150 men', but I think the first page is a reproduction of an earlier article, the photograph looks like it was taken in the 60s. This article on the NOC site about the Interpol[3] (More Fairings sections) talks of a later fairing made by "CLP, the makers of Avon fairings". Here[4] they talk about Doug Mitchenall joining the Rickman workforce. The moulds Doug Mitchenall produced for Dunstall were auctioned by Bonhams in 2013.[https://dunstall.wordpress.com/2013/03/31/dunstall-body-moulds-to-enter-bonhams-auction-at-stafford-show/ Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for those bits; I recognise the 'CLP' but don't associate it with anything particular - I'll add it to my list. The 1980s pic of what is clearly a lorry garage I've never seen before, and can't find the adjacent houses after a quick look. Thought I was going mad - I have Larkhill Rd, probably in one of the big sheds at the rear (not a very good view of the site looking either side). Looks like Doug Mitchenall on left stooping, and with the olde worlde handlebar fairings on the right, I'd agree 1960s. Looks like bath panels in the foreground? The business failed due to over-diversification, allegedly, which is why he walked away. The *first* tailpiece on sale for non-road was for by Avon for Rickman in 1964, as in the linked article; they called it a mudguard. The *first* for road was 1967 Earls court Show/1968 Commando Fastback. I haven't been able to find any contemporary article calling it a tailpiece. There is (was) a pic of a plastic model (! ) alleging 1960 MV or similar was the first with a tailpiece (also on my list, can't find it presently). Checking the old computer mostly 2014 since I looked at Avon.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 22:01, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Took me some searching but the following will give you some idea of the pre-cursor to full touring faring - handlebar fairing with Avon Fairshields from circa 1956 File:2015-03-07 - Thinktank - Sasha Taylor - 241.JPG, File:Move It - Thinktank Birmingham Science Museum - BMA M21 (8616348113).jpg, File:1960 BSA M21 AA combination at Beaulieu Motor Museum.jpg.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 22:44, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Rocknrollmancer, thanks. I can just about remember the AA combos in my childhood. It certainly does show how the touring fairing evolved. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:05, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Good stuff - that's how a lot of small traders got around post-war - chimney sweeps, plumbers, window cleaners, etc. Doug Mitchenall from leaving school age 14 spent the war years learning to be a skilled woodworker building motor torpedo boats on the south coast, then returned home to become a skilled aluminium shaper building woodies from light utility vehicles (what the Aussies still call Ute's) as there was no vehicle production. So that was the basis for the master fairing shapes, executed in aluminium. Didn't know he worked with his dad, though.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 18:41, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

​ Strange you should mention window cleaners. In the early 80s I built a sidecar for a friend when the learner laws changed from being able to ride a 250 to being restricted to 125. His 2 year old CB250 became virtually worthless when the law was announced so he decided to keep it and put a sidecar on it to get round the law. When he passed his test he sold it to a window cleaner who used it for his rounds. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Altimeter Capital

Hi John. Got one new article today. Submitting for your review. -Imcdc (talk) 14:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Imcdc, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:12, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks -Imcdc (talk) 15:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Have a good day

Hi Mr John. Could you please review Draft:Nabi Mammadov and publish it? (talk) 16:36, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi talk, all sorted. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Minerva Academy

Hello, Can you please remove the redirection from Minerva Academy to RoundGlass Punjab. Both are two different teams. It is not possible to open the Minerva Academy FC page.

Hi J Football, I'm not an admin so can't delete pages. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

HiJohn B123, oh crazy :-). Thank you. Regards

P.S.: I hope someone can solve this and remove the redirection.

Hi J Football, you could try bringing it up at WP:RfD. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:04, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi John B123, I am new :-). Can you help me with this. Yesterday I created a new page for RoundGlass Punjab (a new team) and renamed the RoundGlass Punjab FC page back to Minerva Academy FC. Now it is redirected and I cannot find the Minerva Academy page anymore.

Regards and thanks in advance!

Hi J Football, your version of Minerva Academy FC is here[5]. It was subsequently changed back to a redirect. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:27, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the improvement suggestion on my article about Pearpop. Looking forward to seeing you around the Wiki community! Here's a cookie :)

Grimothy29 (talk) 19:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Grimothy29, thanks. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 20:02, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Dragoneer Investment Group

Hi John. Got one new article today. Submitting for your review. -Imcdc (talk) 13:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Imcdc, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:30, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks -Imcdc (talk) 15:31, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Article Dhaka Abahani season.

No I was talking about 2021-22 Abahani Limited Dhaka season. Thanks brother. III69 (talk) 19:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi III69, none of the references are for the 2021-22 season. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

I will add brother. III69 (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

No 3 and 5 reference indicate that's Dhaka Abahani upcoming season. Thanks brother of mine. Have a lovely day. III69 (talk) 15:38, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

​ Reference 5 is about the 2021 AFC Cup and doesn't mention the 21/22 season. Reference 5 is from facbook which isn't a reliable source. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:45, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for my misunderstandings. I will provide more references day by day. I am still new in Wikipedia. I am learning brother. I will update more information as soon as possible. God keep you safe. III69 (talk) 15:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Good morning. I have created yesterday 2 clubs article. If you free brother kindly review-2021-22 Bashundhara Kings season and 2021-22 Uttar Baridhara Club season. Thanks brother. III69 (talk) 08:33, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi III69, again none of the references are for the 2021-22 season. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:16, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Sorry brother. Keep it if is it not suitable for review. After end the league which ongoing it will be okay. Much love. III69 (talk) 15:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

A Review Request

Hello John B123, do you think you could review two of my articles Ray Girardin and Andre Rosey Brown (recently accepted at AFC), if you time. Regards. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 02:48, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi MoviesandTelevisionFan. I see Andre Rosey Brown has already been reviewed. Ray Girardin was previously deleted - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Girardin. I'm not sure the problem of lack of WP:SIGCOV has been addressed. The two main sources are obituaries, but there doesn't seem to be much in-depth coverage whilst he was alive. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:28, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi John B123. I see. But do you think, you could just review the Ray Girardin. This was the deleted revision [6]. Regards. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 15:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi MoviesandTelevisionFan, I can, but would add a {{notability}} tag for the reasons above. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi John B123, Ok, I'm cool with that, but probably make it as Notability 1=Biographies, but idk. But go ahead. Regards. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 16:49, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

On Meaning

Hi. On which statements do you think I should add citations?Ofir michael (talk) 16:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ofir michael, except for the lead the article is unreferenced so needs citations. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 20:22, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

For reviewing and tagged the pages I created. What does that do? Ebbedlila (talk) 22:19, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ebbedlila, it's part of the New Page Patrol to check that new articles meet the minimum standards for inclusion. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:20, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback for my Pages

Hi John, Can you help me to share your thoughts on these pages [7], [8],[9] created by me in the past. Please feel free to add tags and concerns so that I will learn them and share your thoughts. I have to update many drafts but need your suggestions for these pages as of now. Also, how to know if the page is orphan or not? Aloolkaparatha (talk) 14:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Aloolkaparatha. INSAT-2D looks fine. Both Shahed 121 and Smallcase could do with improvements to the English. Shahed 121 needs to make clear where the incident happened, at present reads as if happened in Virginia. Smallcase doesn't make it clear that it's a company until the "History" section. I'm not sure it meets the notability requirements of WP:NCORP. To see what links to a page, click on "What links here" in the Tools menu of the left. Regards.--John B123 (talk) 15:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Dorea (cloth)

Hello John Sir, How are you? Kindly review the subject. Thanks RV (talk) 16:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, I'm good thanks, hope you are too. I was thinking earlier today I hadn't heard from you for a while. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:49, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your support and care. Best regards RV (talk) 00:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Chinese diplomat stub

Hello, I've deleted the tagging of Chen Chih-mai with the Chinese diplomat stub, not because that's wrong, but because of the flag. It's an inappropriate to have a Republic of China diplomat tagged with the PRC flag, but I don't know how to fix it! Lots of Chinese diplomats (including Qing ones also) were not PRC diplomats! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheijiashaojun (talk • contribs) 21:13, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sheijiashaojun, I've added {{Taiwan-diplomat-stub}} to the article. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 21:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, that's the right flag...but neither Chen or his government would have thought of themselves as Taiwanese, and Chen had no family ties there and spent never spent much time there, having grown up in Mainland China, been educated in the US, and represented the ROC abroad. Is there no way of doing "Chinese diplomat" that doesn't come with the PRC/Taiwan binary? He was neither, he was Republic of China.

Hi Sheijiashaojun, are you looking for:

or without flag:

--John B123 (talk) 22:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

-- For this figure, either one would be appropriate. Don't understand Wiki style around flags. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheijiashaojun (talk • contribs) 23:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sheijiashaojun, I've changed the stub on the article for the first one. You might want to have a look at MOS:FLAG for the guidelines for flags. Regards --John B123 (talk) 07:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Much appreciated!

Amandari

Hi John, thanks for your input and proposal for the speedy deletion of the page about Amandari. Please note that the article is purely informational and not promotional by any means. The article complements existing articles about Aman Resorts and its various notable properties. The article has been written with emphasis to the hotel's historical and architectural significance. I believe there is much merit to keep the article. Many thanks. Raymondeuro (talk) 10:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

need help

Hello Mr John.İ need your help. I joined wikipedia for the first time but i forgot my account's password. Then i created a new account and made an article but the admins detected me as a sockpuppet and all the articles I created were deleted.The article belongs to the athlete and fully complies with the criteria.you already did in the review of the article.I request you to publish this article yourself. If you want to fulfill my request, I can send your article to your e-mail address in accordance with wikipedia standards and with references. All you have to do is publish it. I understand if you don't want to do it. thanks anyway

Hi MichealCarrik12, sorry, that's not something I could help you with. Regard. --John B123 (talk) 12:38, 10 July 2021 (UTC)--John B123 (talk) 12:38, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Mulboos khas

Hi! John Sir, Kindly review the Mulboos Khas. Thanks RV (talk) 13:10, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, I marked it as reviewed a couple of minutes ago. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 13:12, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

OK, Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 13:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		Thanks for reviewing so many of the pages I've created! Your work is much appreciated. $ufyan (talk) 20:10, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi $ufyan, thanks, that's most kind of you. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 20:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Re: 2009 Città di Caltanissetta

What more do I need to include for the page to be published, it has all the same information as the singles version of the same page and it meets the WikiProject Tennis notability guidelines as it is part of the ATP Challenger Tour. Please inform me what information I need to provide in order to republish and tell me why it isn't needed on the singles version of the page. Thanks! Hiyouboots (talk) 01:20, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Hiyouboots, the article needs references as per WP:VERIFY. The article had been tagged as such in early June. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Request for the review

Hello John Sir, Kindly review the following pages:

• Tubada (coat)
• Jhuna . Thanks RV (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 08:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

What do I need to do to avoid being drafted when creating a new article?

Hi, John B123. What do I need to do to avoid being drafted when creating a new article? Thank you. --BRICK93 (talk) 09:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi BRICK93, do you mean preventing a new article being sent to draft? Regards. --John B123 (talk) 09:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

John B123, yes. Wouldn't it be sent to the draft if I had at least one reference? Thank you. --BRICK93 (talk) 09:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi BRICK93, if the article had a single reference it would probably be tagged with {{refimprove}} rather than sent to draft. You can buy yourself some time to improve a new article by adding {{in creation}} to the top of the page, but this only lasts for a few hours. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 09:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

BNY Mellon Investment Management

Hi John. Got one new article today. Submitting for your review -Imcdc (talk) 08:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Imcdc, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 09:21, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks -Imcdc (talk) 10:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

On Adeleke Alex-Adedipe

You were far too gracious to have done this I have gone ahead to do this. The sourcing is non existent. Celestina007 (talk) 16:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Celestina007, I don't recall the article and as it has been deleted now I can't see the diffs. --John B123 (talk) 16:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

It was a promotional one on a non notable individual. I G11'd it but that’s moot now as it has been deleted. However, i have taken steps, or rather, initiated a process to deal with the root cause of the problem. Celestina007 (talk) 16:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

@Celestina007: Well done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Notability of Chris O'Neill (YouTuber)

Hello, I just want to let you know that a deletion discussion of the old article discussed this issue and concluded that the subject was notable; the discussion was closed as "keep." I moved Chris O'Neill (Youtuber) to Chris O'Neill (YouTuber) to correct the misspelling in the title (I did so by blanking the old page and creating a new one, unfamiliar with the proper moving procedure, which I shouldn't have done - sorry). Throast (talk) 12:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Throast, thanks for the info. I've switched the pages so the history of the old page is now the history of the new title. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 12:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! Throast (talk) 12:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: The talk page for Chris O'Neill (YouTuber) currently is Talk:Move/Chris O'Neill (YouTuber). Is that intentional or am I missing something? Talk:Chris O'Neill (YouTuber) redirects to it. I have to add, I'm very inexperienced when it comes to moving. Throast (talk) 16:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Throast, my mistake, I forgot to tick the "move talk page" box when moving the page. Sorted now. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:21, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

thanks, multiple errors re Mary V. Ahern

Stumbling through a mistaken attempt that resulted in the creation of the article, Mary V. Ahern (broadcast producer), was a second error while attempting to correct a mistake in an article entitled Virginia V. Ahern because the name was incorrect. This article, Mary V. Ahern (broadcast producer), was created in the second mistake and used for a cut and paste attempt to make the correction of name.

The final correction resulted in an article entitled Mary V. Ahern (producer), which should be the only correctly created article for this biography.

My apologies for the two errors of title. I never had learned how to move in order to correct an error in title! Will note all of this at the multiple articles. Lesson learned!

A notation at the directions about "moving to correct title" indicated that a bot would clean up this dreadful mess I made. Here's hoping that is correct, because the article, Mary V. Ahern (broadcast producer) was created incorrectly, is redundant, and should be deleted. As Annie Oakley declared, "I'll never do it again!" You placed a tag on this incorrect article that should be deleted. so I will remove the tag and make note of the complicated history. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 16:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi 83d40m, no problem. I've redirected Mary V. Ahern (broadcast producer) to Mary V. Ahern (producer). If you get into this situation in the future give me a shout, I have extended pagemover rights so can usually move pages without difficulties. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Many thanks! I was concerned because of having used cut and paste for the one you tagged and having seen warnings that using that process messed up the history carried with an article — again, my apologies. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 17:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

@83d40m: If you want the redundant pages deleted rather than being redirects then blank the page and add {{Db-g7}}. As there are no other Mary V. Ahern's on Wikipedia, the disambiguation of "(producer)" isn't needed and the page should be at Mary V. Ahern. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

John B123, perhaps there are residual errors. Mary V. Ahern (producer) has "DEFAULTSORT:Ahern, Virginia V." above her categories. Should that be changed to "Ahern, Mary V."? Also, should there be a way for a search for "Mary V. Ahern" to offer an option for "Mary V. Ahern (producer)"? I do not see that offered and am concerned that readers must know to call for the "producer" in order to be given a selection in the search box. _ _ _ _ 83d40m (talk) 17:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

@83d40m: The DEFAULT needs to be changed. The search problems you outline are another reason to keep article titles simple and without disambiguation unless necessary. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Excuse me

Do you have any other things to do except for supervising my new articles? Whenever i write something, there you are! An hour or two haven't passed! Let someone else do revision sometimes. You have so much other articles to look at............please.... Oksimormon (talk) 09:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Oksimormon. I've reviewed 143 articles in the last 24 hours, only one of them was created by you. The other two you created were reviewed by somebody else. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Carissa Walford

Hi John, I noticed you flagged the page I created for Australian TV host and actress for deletion. I highly contest that status. She has had a wide career in Australian media and entertainment which I wrote about and cited fully. Wiki Commons has many photos of her available too at press events, which doesn't occur with people that aren't notable. I have contested the deletion in the form, but your help to remove that too would be great.

@Grapepinky: Please read the deletion nomination. It's the promotional way the article is written that is the problem. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Maybe that's just my style of writing... but I'm not sure how listing a persons work is promotional, it's fact. How would you suggest? Grapepinky (talk) 17:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

@Grapepinky: Phrases like Walford hit TV screens as a face of Channel [V] at just 23 years old aren't just stating facts. --John B123 (talk) 17:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Ok thanks. I've tried to make some small tweaks but I'm really stuck how else this could be edited any further. When comparing this to similar pages to people in this industry, this is very similar. Feel free to jump in and make any edits you see appropriate. I'm quite new here and just trying to help.Grapepinky (talk) 17:47, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

@Grapepinky: I've made a few more changes to try and make it a bit more neutral and also flow better. On a different subject, interviews and YouTube aren't normally regarded as reliable sources, so if you could add some references from independent sources that would be good. (Obviously the direct quote from the interview needs to be referenced from the interview). Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:47, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you kindlyGrapepinky (talk) 19:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

ANI mention

Hi John - hope you are well. For info, and incase you didn't get the ping, I mentioned you in this thread with regards to the aricle patrolling you have done in relation to articles I've created. I'd be grateful for your input. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Lugnuts, thanks for the info, I've left a comment. --John B123 (talk) 19:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Sources on Acts of the Scottish Parliament

Hiya - you've tagged a couple of the lists of Acts of the Scottish Parliament as not having any sources here and here. I'm a little confused, because the Acts themselves are the sources. Plus there are direct links to legislation.gov.uk (the official source of UK legislation). Am I okay to remove those tags? --Theknightwho (talk) 12:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Theknightwho, I did have to think hard about the various lists of legislation you have created. Where an Act has its own article then a reference in the list isn't needed. Where there is no article for the Act, you have referenced by a link to the legislation. However, per WP:CS:EMBED, inline external links shouldn't be used for referencing. If all these links were converted to references it wouldn't improve the article, in fact the clarity of the article would be reduced, so decided, after asking a couple of other people for their views, that WP:COMMONSENSE was more applicable than EMBED.

Most of the list articles you created had references to the explanatory notes in the lead, but a couple didn't which were the ones I tagged. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi John - thanks for this, and I appreciate the thought you've put into it. I've tried to work the template into a form that is both intuitive and points the user in the right direction. From a practical perspective, it's important to keep the links on all Acts (rather than just those without a WP article), as legislation prescribes legislation.gov.uk (if uploaded) or else the Queen's/King's Printer versions as the authoritative versions of Acts, and the Parliamentary Archives contain the original Acts (as well as scans of the Queen's/King's Printer edition for most local Acts). As such, the links are there to ensure people find those resources as easily as possible.

The mess that is the catalogue of UK legislation has annoyed me for a long time (on far more places than just WP!), so I decided to take some time to actually sort it out. I anticipate this will be a long term project in the works, as the number of Acts increases substantially the further back you go (1846 has 117 public, 402 local and 51 private Acts, for example). For most local and personal Acts, I am already having to manually type out the short and long titles as very few have been digitised prior to 1991 - even in the various commercial databases I have access to. Even then, I can only use those as an aid, as the real source must be the Queen's/King's Printer version.

In terms of the articles you've tagged, they're for Acts of the Scottish Parliament, where the paragraph about the difference in citation between pre- and post-1963 legislation doesn't apply. Would you be happy with a short paragraph explaining that Acts are cited by calendar year, with references referring to the relevant legislation? I can do the equivalent for Welsh and Northern Irish legislation, too. The plan is to split these out by year as well, as they're a bit unwieldy at the moment.

I will also be doing equivalent lists by for each Parliament, subdivided by session - partly because this will make my life easier pre-1963 in terms of the operation of my working spreadsheet, as the series run by session rather than year (and I can then copy over the relevant Acts to the correct annual list), but also because it serves a different function from a research perspective, as it groups Acts together into a cohesive chunk that were passed with a particular legislative aim. Some sessions began in November or December or ran for multiple years, which means that it's harder to get a picture of what that Parliament did if I'm a student of political history, for example. On the other hand, the annual lists are useful for anyone simply trying to track down an Act based on its short title citation.

--Theknightwho (talk) 17:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Theknightwho, you've certainly set yourself a mammoth task! I did work on a project outside WP looking at the legislation in a specific area and found the UK online legislation not-user friendly and inconsistent so you have my admiration for taking this on.

Your proposal for the Scottish Acts sounds fine. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks John - my various attempts to prod the National Archives into increasing the scope of legislation.gov.uk (predictably) failed, but at least this should provide lists that are easier on the eye, with the long titles giving an idea of what an Act relates to.

An area that I perhaps would like help in is improving the templates. There are six (page header, list header and list entry, with the list entry containing a URL generator for legislation.gov.uk (not pre-1963 compatible yet), a URL generator for the Parliamentary archives (pre-1963 compatible) and one for the optional link icons), and they currently work well enough with only minimal data input required for use (sans some minor tweaks relating to width for mobile), but the original reason for splitting out into indiviudal years was because I seemed to hit some kind of limit on the list entry template. If you look at this old version of what was then 2000-2019, for example, you can see that the template fails to load mid-2012, on the 495th instance. The html gives the warning "WARNING: template omitted, post-expand include size too large". This is likely to pose a problem when the number of Acts in a year reaches 400+ (e.g. 1846 above has 570).

It would help to know how templates get loaded. If, for example, the limit is reached because it's trying to load the entirety of the list entry template 494 times (totalling 1.6MB) and hitting an arbitrary limit, then the issue is soluble through the judicious use of LUA so that I can reduce the size of the template by at least 20-30% - I've already created a module that automatically generates the correct session citation, list sort order and URL infixes based on an (as yet incomplete) LUA database I've been filling in - but if the issue is that the html as provided to the user exceeds some arbitrary limit once all modules and templates have finished processing, then it feels like a hard limit. Could it also be that it's unnecessarily loading the LUA database 495+ times (33.2MB), meaning that it should be split out into separate chunks for each function?

Do you know what a solution might be (or, possibly, someone much better with templates than I am who might be kind enough to sort the whole thing out)?

Theknightwho (talk) 18:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Theknightwho, I'm ok on simple templates but this is beyond me I'm afraid. You could ask somebody with "Template editor" rights, who presumably will know more than me. There's a list of some of them here. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks - will have a play around to see if I can narrow down the bottleneck and if I can't manage it I'll put a message on there. Would rather not have to do documentation/explaining til it's in a finalised state! Cheers again for all your help on this. --Theknightwho (talk) 19:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

I have found the answer - it was hitting the post-expand include size limit of 2,097,152 bytes. The solution is to reduce the size of the templates, which I can do by doing any conditional code in LUA so that the template only contains a short #invoke call. Thought I'd mention as an FYI! --Theknightwho (talk) 22:19, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

​ Glad to hear you've managed to sort it out. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 22:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Request for the review

Hi! John Sir, Good morning to you! Kindly review the following stubs:

• Salembaree
• Peshgeer.
• Nightingale's eye pattern Thanks RV (talk) 13:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, Salembaree was already marked as reviewed. I've reviewed the other 2. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 02:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

High-A stadium lists

Thanks for reviewing my recently created articles, "List of High-A Central/East/West stadiums" as well as the overarching article, "List of High-A baseball stadiums". Regarding the refimprove template that you added, is this because you believe that each needs an additional number of sources or that the sources provided do not adequately support the content of the articles? In the latter case, all material is either found in the sources provided or is attributable to a source (even though not attributed) but unlikely to be challenged, in accordance with WP:NOR. Or, perhaps my use of the term "General references" was misleading? These articles are similar to the ones titled, "High-A Central/East/West", containing almost the same information and using the same main source but are focused on each league's teams instead of its stadiums. Waz⁸:T-C-E 00:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Waz⁸. "General references" has been misused in the past and therefore inline citations are the recommended way of referencing, WP:VERIFY specifically refers to inline citations. This is fine for text but doesn't work so well for tables. General consensus is that for a table it is not necessary to reference every row or cell, but a single reference for the table is sufficient (provided that reference verifies the whole table).

A single reference for the whole article, or the bulk of the article is also not recommended. If that source goes down then the article becomes unreferenced. No matter how good the source, there is the possibility of inadvertent errors or typos. Multiple sources help to overcome these potential problems. Additionally, notability per WP:GNG is shown by significant coverage in reliable sources .... multiple sources are generally expected. Whilst an article only having a single source doesn't make it non-notable, equally, it doesn't demonstrate it meets the notability guidelines. Hope that all makes sense. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:53, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Yes, it all does make sense! While the single (General) reference verifies the entire table, I see your point about the need for multiple sources and will add some when I have time to do more editing. Waz⁸:T-C-E 04:05, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Notability Sakura-tai Chiru

You questioned the notability of this film/article. If you had checked the sources/references, this film has been mentioned not only by serious online source/film magazine Kinema Junpo, but even more so in printed form – among others – in Critical Handbook of Japanese Film Directors by renowned film scholar Alexander Jacoby, and an essay by renowned critic Jasper Sharp for the British Film Institute (plus two others). Robert Kerber (talk) 21:45, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

@Robert Kerber: Per WP:NFILM and WP:GNG 'significant coverage' is required not just mentions. The page as written give no indication that any of the criteria of WP:NFO are met either. --John B123 (talk) 22:12, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dinçer Kosovalı

Hello, I am writing for the Dinçer Kosovali article. It may appear as promotional to you, but there are sources where brand information is publicly available, following Wikipedia and social media pages verified in their own country. If you'll excuse me, I want to work again before removing the delete button. Kind regards,Seyit12 (talk) 21:47, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Seyit12. I see the article has now been deleted. You can ask the deleting admin, Materialscientist, to restore it so you can work on it. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 21:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi I got it, but Materialscientist told me it was restored. I moved it for him. I'm making changes right now. So, is there anything you want me to change? I would be happy if you leave your comments. Thanks. Seyit12 (talk) 00:46, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Request for the review

Hello John Sir, Please review the Mirzai (garment). Thanks and regards RV (talk) 13:56, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:00, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and warm regards RV (talk) 15:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi! John Sir, Please review the Anggiya. Regards RV (talk) 02:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 06:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello John Sir, Thanks for reviewing Anggiya. Please review the Ekpatta. Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 13:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 02:47, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Review of my new article

Dear User:John B123. I've just sent my draft:Gismart (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gismart) to review via AfC process. I saw you made some suggestions on it. If you have time, can you please review or criticize my draft a little bit? Or just delete it if it's not worth being on wikipedia. I don't want to mess a lot around. Thanks! P.S. I saw you gave suggestions to my another article Pan Vision. Sorry for misleading you. --Golden Ranky (talk) 12:08, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Golden Ranky, I don't think you've misled me at all. Draft:Gismart has now been reviewed by an AfC reviewer. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 14:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Can you please Guide?

Hey John, Shreya here. You reviewed my Article recently, I don't understand what's wrong. Can you please help me and guide me to make my Article a better one? Please?

Regards, Shreya.

Link for my article- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratnan_Prapancha

Hi, Shreyaunchalli, as per WP:NFF, unreleased films need to show the production was notable. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi , john. You have reviews my page Jarjangi. It is a wiki page about my village created by me. Want is the wrong of my page , that was moved to draft space. Could please explain detailed about that issue. Vetri Murugan (talk) 15:25, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Abrawan

Hello! John Sir, Please review the subject. Thanks RV (talk) 15:24, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 16:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Samuel Asklöf

Hi John, I am planning to move this into mainspace. I believe it is passing WP:NHOCKEY. Are we on the same page? Any suggestion, Ice hockey is new for me. Sonofstar (talk) 19:08, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sonofstar, ice hockey isn't an area of my expertise but looks to me it satisfies WP:NHOCKEY. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:14, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Nor mine, I am just starting with it and I moved the page in the mainspace. Thanks Sonofstar (talk) 19:16, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sonofstar, I've marked it as reviewed. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:29, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Dosa

		A plate of Dosa for you
		Here is a plate of Dosa for you. Dosa is a South Indian food and is a fermented crepe or pancake made from rice batter and black lentils. Hope you'll like it. Thank and regards. RV (talk) 04:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks RV, most kind of you. Regards.--John B123 (talk) 08:03, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

LionTree

Hi John. Got one new article today. Submitting for your review. -Imcdc (talk) 05:13, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Imcdc, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks -Imcdc (talk) 08:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Singeing (textiles)

Hello John Sir, Please review the Singeing (textiles). Thanks RV (talk) 15:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 03:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi! John Sir, Please review the Fashion icon. Thanks RV (talk) 06:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. I'm surprised we didn't already have an article for this. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 06:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

John Sir, Mee too. But I have noticed that there is a redirect of Fashion icons to Fashion design. That is a different profession. Is not it? What should we do ? Can we re-redirect Fashion icons to Fashion icon. Kindly advise. Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 06:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, I've changed Fashion icons to redirect to Fashion icon. Regards --John B123 (talk) 07:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you RV (talk) 07:40, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

당신을 위한 반스타!

	오리지널 반스타
	Thank you for your kind editing. 칼빈500 (talk) 12:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks 칼빈500, most kind of you. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 13:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Doubt

There is a lot to learn from you. How do you realise that Babakuli Annakov is also published in Russian? Sonofstar (talk) 19:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sonofstar, you can see if there are any other language versions on Wikdata. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 19:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Sam Sailor. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, List of awards and nominations received by Aftab Shivdasani, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sam Sailor 21:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for reviewing Rosa Monfasani's article!

Virc587 (talk) 16:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Virc587, thanks. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Cape Wool

Hello John, Sir, Kindly review the subject page. Thanks RV (talk) 12:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, John, Sir, Kindly review the Silk surfacing also. Best regards RV (talk) 15:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, also done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 17:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 17:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Request for the review

John, Sir, Please review the following.

• Pulled wool
• Pulled (disambiguation) Thanks and best regards. RV (talk) 04:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you and warm regards RV (talk) 07:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

help

hi dear you can check Seyed Ebrahim Amerian articles? and please remove tag? Thanks

Hi Azim kami, the AfD tag can't be removed until the discussion is complete. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 22:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

General Officers notability

Hi, some of the General Officer articles I have created, some of which have been reviewed, are being proposed for deletion. I remember in one of the discussions for an article you noted GOs are considered notable. Do you have recommendations on how to proceed? Thank you. KingEdinburgh (talk) 02:03, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi KingEdinburgh. General Officers will normally survive at WP:AfD - see WP:PEOPLEOUTCOMES. However, this is not policy (more like case law), so GOs need to comply with WP:GNG, which requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. WP:PROD is an unopposed deletion, so any editor can remove the tag if they object to the deletion. Once removed, the tag cannot be re-added. The editor who added the tag could then send the article to AfD.

If you remove the tag and the articles get sent to AfD they will probably not be deleted. In your situation I would add a couple of references from non-military sources to show compliance with GNG rather than have to potentially go through the bother of AfD. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:12, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your vote on the AfD. Thanks also for detailing and uncomplicating the process of AfD and PROD for me. KingEdinburgh (talk) 01:07, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Barré (fabric)

John, Sir, Please review the subject. Thanks RV (talk) 17:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 18:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and best regards RV (talk) 18:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Andrew Pi

Hi John. Got one new article today. Submitting for your review.

-Imcdc (talk) 01:31, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Imcdc, all done. Regards.

Thanks! -Imcdc (talk) 06:59, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Coats of skin

Hello John, Sir, Please review the subject. Thanks and regards RV (talk) 05:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 06:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much! RV (talk) 07:37, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Albert cloth

Hi John, Sir, Please review the Albert cloth. Thanks and regards RV (talk) 10:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 15:51, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you and warm regards. RV (talk) 07:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Biretz

Hi John, Sir, Please review the Biretz. Thanks and regards. RV (talk) 07:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi RV, all done. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 07:46, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks and best regards. RV (talk) 07:58, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Claudia Sulewski

Hey John, you left a notability tag on a new page I created, and I believe this is a mistake, here is why:

I believe there are no primary sources in the article. The first source, the YouTube channel, was added by Wikipedia by default since it is included in the "Infobox YouTube personality" section. The highly trusted publications referenced are Teen Vogue, Deadline Hollywood, Business Insider, V Magazine, and Glamor Mexico. The other sources include a review/recap of a tv show on Geek Girl Authority in which her character and she are mentioned and an uneditable wiki influencermarketinghub.com/wiki/ limited to "listing the most popular influencers and creators on the planet" that also cites its sources, and a couple of regular news sites Digiday and Cheatsheet.

Four additional Wikipedia pages mention her by name in a Wikipedia search.

If you still have an issue, could you please relay to me a more detailed explanation? If you require some missing type of source, please let me know.

Thank you for reading, considering, and your work on Wikipedia.

JacksonBlu (talk) 09:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi JacksonBlu. To be honest, I struggle to see how any YouTubers meet WP:CREATIVE. Popularity, as in number of followers, isn't the same thing as notability. However that is a personal view, so I'd have no objection to you removing the tag and letting the next reviewer who looks at the article give their views. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 10:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)