Joeyjoeymintzmintz

Joeyjoeymintzmintz, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Joeyjoeymintzmintz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Eastport, New York, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". BlueboyLINY (talk) 04:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeyjoeymintzmintz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was unaware of the differences between minor edits and disruptive edits. No edits I made were major nor intended to be disruptive. I am now aware of the differences and resolve to not make disruptive edits in the future. [[1]] Joeyjoeymintzmintz (talk) 14:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is a bizarre unblock request. You seem to be saying you thought it was okay to make disruptive edits so long as you marked them "minor". You don't describe how your future edits would differ from your previous edits. Yamla (talk) 20:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeyjoeymintzmintz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not think it was okay to make disruptive edits. I did not even know that I was making disruptive edits, I honestly thought they were minor edits. I was unaware of the difference between minor edits and non-minor edits. I am now acutely aware of the differences and will not make disruptive edits in the future. Wikipedia is a truly special place on the internet and it would be an honor to be a contributor. Joeyjoeymintzmintz (talk) 19:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The other issue that I see here is that you seem to have a conflict of interest and may be a paid editor. Please tell how your edits will be consistent with those policies and describe the topics you will edit about. 331dot (talk) 08:59, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[[2]]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeyjoeymintzmintz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, there are paid editors? I thought Wikipedia is edited by volunteers. The topics that I will edit will be primarily in the alcohol industry with a focus on canned drinks. There has been an explosion of products available that do not yet have pages on Wikipedia. Thank you for your reconsiderationJoeyjoeymintzmintz (talk) 14:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 12:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To answer your question without passing on your request: By "paid editors", we mean people who are paid by third parties to post content here, usually of a promotional nature. Go scrolling through Upwork or Fiverr, you'll see a lot of those out there. We allow this only as long as the editor discloses the relationship prior to posting. Daniel Case (talk) 18:24, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Joey, may I also suggest that you read WP:N and WP:OR. Not all companies or brands or products meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Just because something exists doesn't mean it's an appropriate encyclopedia entry. Moreover, you don't have to be a paid editor to have a conflict of interest, and adding first-hand knowledge is not allowed. Matuko (talk) 01:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canned cocktails

A tag has been placed on Category:Canned cocktails indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Craft cocktails

A tag has been placed on Category:Craft cocktails indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ready to Drink

A tag has been placed on Category:Ready to Drink indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)