Welcome! edit

Hi Jitka Stankova! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! —Bagumba (talk) 00:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Lonzo Ball, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically, links are generally not repeated per MOS:REPEATLINK.Bagumba (talk) 00:55, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Engr. Smitty. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Willie Cauley-Stein, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Engr. Smitty Werben 16:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Dāvis Bertāns. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Engr. Smitty Werben 01:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at LaMarcus Aldridge, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 01:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Godzilla, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Armegon (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning' the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shanghai Sharks.
And at Ben Simmons.'
JesseRafe (talk) 19:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Fuzheado | Talk 20:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jitka Stankova, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

JesseRafe (talk) 17:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply