Jean Eti

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilhering College (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wilhering College and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Jean Eti, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilhering College has been accepted

Wilhering College, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 08:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Canisiuskirche article

Hello, thanks for writing this! I've just been starting to add a few things to the article - tags on the talk page, categories, linking to the dewiki article and so on - and I wondered if there were any more sources you could add? I realise that this is a translation from dewiki, but much of the content is unsourced and I'm wondering if there are more sources out there or if it might be best to remove what text can't be sourced.

Let me know what you think. Blythwood (talk) 17:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, thank you very much for your help! Actually nearly all information in the text is sourced, but unfortunately by only three different sources. Therefore I have added the sources at the end of the paragraphs. At the end of my main source (also a wiki) several books are given as source, unfortunately I do not know them. Anyway, there is no critical information in the article, just a description of the church. I therefore think that the given sources are sufficient. --Jean Eti (talk) 07:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)