December 2018

edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Barcode. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 22:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello Alexf. It is unclear to me why adding two links to cite the relevant US patemts to this barcode and one link to the peer reviewed, published academic paper describing this barcode are considered spam links by you. Perhaps it is because the latter links to a resource on my own academic website?

I note you made several judgements to Wikipedia contributions last night this one within just a few tens of seconds. Perhaps in haste you did not notice that the final link, which was made to my own academic website, is a genuine research paper and is linked in this way to avoid posting the more authoritative link to the ACM Digital Library which is behind a paywall. That official link is

https://doi.org/10.1145/1411759.1411782

It is common for academics to share accepted preprints of their articles via their University web pages in this way to improve open access to science. Jcollomosse (talk) 06:34, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing (CVSSP) (March 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~Kvng (talk) 17:47, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Jcollomosse! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Kvng (talk) 17:47, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing (CVSSP)

edit
 

Hello, Jcollomosse. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Centre for Vision Speech and Signal Processing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 11:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply