User talk:Jbmurray/Archive 20
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
DYK for Cartucho
 | On 12 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cartucho, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nellie Campobello's Cartucho is the only canonical literary representation of the Mexican Revolution written by a woman? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cartucho. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Question re: Wiki Ed on meta
Hi there, Wanted to ping a discussion over at the Wiki Education Foundation Talk page on meta. Hope to hear from you soon! --- Eryk (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Cascadia Wikimedians page at English Wikipedia
Feel free to add Wikipedia:Cascadia Wikimedians User Group to your watchlist to stay updated about CWUG-related activities and events. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Latin American literature | |
|---|---|
| ... you were recipient no. 823 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:24, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
... and five! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
In case you're wondering ...
... why you were pinged, there's a fairly substantial, and very civil, conversation on my talk page about sourcing. It begins here with the original question. In the "Break two" section the issue of historiography and transformative texts has been mentioned, and I believe that's something you could speak to better than I, if you were inclined to chime in. Anyway, just explaining the reason for the ping. Victoria (tk) 23:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Assessment for article on Vancouver's Downtown Eastside
Hi Jon. I've been working on an article that I thought you might be interested in: Downtown Eastside. I've just nominated it for the A-class assessment and I'm hoping to take it through the Featured Article assessment process. If you're interested and have the time to assess it, be bold and edit it, or offer any advice, that would be really appreciated! Cheers, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 05:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
Hello, Jbmurray. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Painter
Jon, if you've time/inclination: User:The Interior/Lawrence Paul Yuxweluptun. The Interior (Talk) 23:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Invitation to Training Modules design conversation
Hello! We are leaving you this message because you have previously indicated that you interested in helping the Wikimedia Foundation Support & Safety team in developing our training modules this year.
We appreciate all the help and thoughts users like you have offered thus far. We would like to encourage you, if you are interested, to participate in the next step of our development: a community consultation about the design and structure of the modules. Note that we're not yet gathering feedback on the content of the modules - a separate consultation about that will be starting soon.
In this "design" consultation, we're looking for advice on things like the best place to host these modules, the accessibility of content, and other potential design decisions. Please feel free to leave any thoughts you have about these things on the talk page. Thanks! Kbrown (WMF) (talk) 18:06, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
| | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |