Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Jbarrow51, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Help desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 16:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Check your work before you save, using Preview

When you edit a page, you can use the Preview button (located right next to the Save page button) to see in advance what your edits will look like. This lets you check your work periodically without filling up the page history by making lots of smaller edits. The preview function can also help you avoid mistakes, such as when using an unfamiliar type of wiki markup. The preview will appear together with the edit box you have been working in (either above or below it, however you prefer).

An even faster way to preview a page is with the keyboard shortcut ⇧ Shift+alt+P.

Read more:
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Proposed deletion of Sawyer-Barrow House edit

 

The article Sawyer-Barrow House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBUILDING, sources and references need to demonstrate significant coverage about the building not its builder.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sawyer-Barrow House for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sawyer-Barrow House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sawyer-Barrow House until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MB 02:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Editing comments edit

I recently found Historic country estates in Lake County, Ohio which you created and expanded greatly, and I find it very interesting and admire your research. However, I do have some suggestions, since you have solicited them:

  • Since the article already specifies Ohio, you don't need the "Ohio"/"Oh" in the location column, just use the city etc. name by itself using a piped link, or you can use the pipe trick, though I usually don't.
  • I'm not sure what the bold signifies. You probably don't need it. See MOS:BOLD.
  • Some of it borders on WP:NOTGUIDE, especially regarding the small subject area, but you may be OK if it hasn't been challenged by now.
  • The Plain Dealer journalists in the past have commented specifically that it's not the Cleveland Plain Dealer. (Example on request, I'm going on memory right now).
  • Speaking of which, you probably don't need the note about the library card. While it's courteous to note, those who have it probably already know and those who don't probably don't care, and it's such a relatively small WP audience. There is an option in WP:Cite news for URL access availability.
  • I-90 in Lake County opened in segments, and not all of them in 1959 (see Interstate 90 in Ohio; I've tried to put as much in there as possible, but it doesn't help that The News-Herald doesn't have an index).
Thanks Mapsax . I modified my statement to reflect that in 1959 I-90 was only being constructed in the western part of lake Co. It was this construction that had the major impact on the estates like Winden, Mooreland, Nortonwood, KingWood, Greystone Manor, HiLo Farms and even more recently the Bolton estate. I've always been curious what considerations went into the decision to build I-90 where they did rather using possible alternate routes. Jbarrow51 (talk) 16:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Digging through old newspapers might reveal some things. I know that I've seen reports for other planned highways; there's been more emphasis in the process during the EPA era, but I'm sure there's at least limited coverage for projects prior to that. From my limited research, the route of I-90 was influenced more by old Lake Erie beach ridges and the edge of the Allegheny Plateau than any property along the route. Researching the Cincinnati-Conneaut Turnpike might help you (a quick Google search already brought this). Good luck. Mapsax (talk) 01:18, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Anyway, I hope I haven't been too critical. Mapsax (talk) 02:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I forgot to mention, please remember to put the appropriate number of colons before your talk page responses for appropriate indentation (as I just did on this line; in other words, any reply to this will need two colons). Mapsax (talk) 02:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for taking the time to review this page. I agree about removing Ohio from the location column and dropping Cleveland from the Plain Dealer reference. However, I do like mentioning the fact that accessing the Plain Dealer is free as I feel some WP Editors might assume I was steering readers towards a paid site. Jbarrow51 (talk) 16:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
First, I just want to make clear that it wasn't an official WP review, though you probably knew that, just my humble thoughts. Second, I wouldn't worry about the latter – paywalls are everywhere, and citing a reliable source in the form of a long-established local newspaper of record (I believe) won't raise any suspicions. See WP:RSC. (Technically you don't have to link to anything at all – see WP:OFFLINE – but of course it's ideal if possible.) There is WP:PAY but it doesn't look like that that affects you. Mapsax (talk) 00:05, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply