JayShah2002

November 2019

Hello, I'm UnnamedUser. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Draft:Desi Namu—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. UnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 07:19, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

UnnamedUser, I'm afraid you may be the one making unconstructive edits here. We've been advising JayShah2002 to cut some of the detail in the draft so that it may become more like an encyclopedia article - and in my opinion, that means cutting out 2/3rds or 3/4ths of the current text. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:27, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Desi Namu has a new comment

(moved from IP talk page)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Desi Namu. Thanks! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

While you wait

Reviews can take a long time. While you wait, I suggest that you look at History of accounting and see if you can find some references that would allow you to add the missing information about how accounting developed on the Indian subcontinent and, if you are so inclined, other parts of Asia. The acknowledged Eurocentric leanings of Wikipedia often result in unbalanced coverage of non-European information and you could provide a valuable service here. (Just don't try to add your entire 40,000 character draft.) — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)