Olokomane

edit

Hi Jamezwiki, hope all is well. Re the question in your email, you can do it either way, it doesn't really matter. However I'm not sure that the draft is ready for the mainspace. Please review the Notability criteria. You need significant coverage by multiple reliable sources. Alaexis¿question? 18:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi from me as well! I also received your email. I agree with Alaexis that this article subject may not be notable enough for a standalone article. It's also currently written as a CV, which is not appropriate (see WP:NOTCV). If you'd like help with this article, please let me know by replying here or on my talk page. Have a good day! Actualcpscm (talk) 21:21, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi, just read your email too. I'm going to slightly contradict the part of Alaexis's about it not really mattering. Because there have been two editors to the draft, it is slightly preferred to use the move tool instead of copy and pasting, both for attribution reasons (so that everyone gets the credit they deserve for their work) as well as the actual copyright. The others are right that the draft is not quite ready to be published though, once you've familiarised yourself a bit more with the rules and believe the draft is definitely ready, I'd suggest using the blue button in the box I've just added to the top of the draft, though it does take some time for drafts to be reviewed that way (pointing out the best three sourc should make it go faster). Alpha3031 (tc) 11:33, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Alpha3031! To clarify, copy-and-pasting would not be appropriate per WP:ATTREQ. If you want to change a page's title (including by moving it to a different WP:NAMESPACE), you should always WP:MOVE it. Sorry I didn't point that out before. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I didn't realise there were two contributors. Thanks for correcting me! Alaexis¿question? 15:27, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olokomane (October 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by NotAGenious were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
NotAGenious (talk) 15:24, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Jamezwiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NotAGenious (talk) 15:24, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Júlio Cesar Theodoro moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Júlio Cesar Theodoro. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Rkieferbaum (talk) 20:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply