Jameshancock01, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Jameshancock01! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Universal Process Notation (UPN) (July 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 19:11, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

UPN uploaded diagrams

edit

My reading of the website terms at elements.cloud (terms hosted here: https://app.box.com/s/8rxngmcncj7acymonnosge5xt0p4v61l) is that this is a license that is not compatible with CC BY-SA 3.0 and you did not have the right to release the diagrams, created by someone else, used in Draft:Universal Process Notation (UPN). Before I tag them for deletion as improperly licensed, do you have an explanation that would make deletion unnecessary? — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 14:07, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I am currently an Employee of Elements.Cloud so I assume I have an exception. And, while Elements.Cloud does offer UPN Tooling it is completely free to use and as such these references should not be taken as a form of advertising. It is also impossible to completely separate Elements.Cloud from UPN as the founding partners were also instrumental at Nimbus Partners in the development of the standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameshancock01 (talkcontribs) 14:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
No, that does not sound like an acceptable assignment of the license. I'll have to work on asking that the license situation be reviewed on each of them.
Also, if you have this sort of connection with a subject, it is best if you disclose that fact with a statement on your user page, which does not yet exist. Click on your (red) username to create it. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 01:17, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


Okay, what do I need to do to get an acceptable assignment of the license then? I'll create a user page to show that I am a current employee as well. Jameshancock01 (talk) 08:32, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Jmcgnh:, I have released the copyright permissions through OTRS on all diagrams and source material used. Does that mean all copyright violations have been resolved? And I can proceed to another review? Could you please let me know if there is anything else you think I should do... Thanks for all your continued assistance. Jameshancock01 (talk) 08:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Universal Process Notation (July 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:40, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Universal Process Notation (August 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Clearfrienda 💬 11:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Universal Process Notation (October 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 04:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Universal Process Notation

edit

  Hello, Jameshancock01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Universal Process Notation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply