JamesReynolds331

Blocked stuff if anyone wants to see it

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Thomas White (Australian politician)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 15:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JamesReynolds331 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was trying to prove a point to my class about how wikipedia isnt a reliable source!

Decline reason:

WP:POINT. Looks like the block was appropriate. Yamla (talk) 17:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

JamesReynolds331 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, I am older now and I kinda wanna be a helpful contributor? That was immature me making up excuses. 

Accept reason:

Following consultation with the blocking admin, I have unblocked you. PhilKnight (talk) 16:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

What contributions do you want to make? 331dot (talk) 15:22, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Also, please disclose all other accounts you have access to. --Yamla (talk) 15:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

An article on the Connecticut candidate for District 114 Daniel Cowan, and an article on Candidate Mike Smith. Fix up Mary Welander's and James Maroney's page, and contribute to the Amity Regional HS page. I have access to an account called, ironically, Don't ban me pls mods that iirc was created around the time of my block. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesReynolds331 (talk • contribs)

I have confirmed that account as a sockpuppet. I note that it did not do any edits, so that doesn't preclude reviewing the unblock request here on its merits. --Yamla (talk) 15:37, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Need I explain what I was doing prior to the ban, I was messing around and editing things for fun. I can now see the problems in this, and then the problems of lying to being unbanned. I have matured and seen how this is not funny, or helpful.--JamesReynolds331 (talk) 15:44, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

May 2023

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Tettigoniidae: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. — AP 499D25 (talk) 13:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)