Jake.hackley, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi Jake.hackley! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Elkins (June 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mkdw was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Mkdwtalk 20:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Henry Elkins concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Henry Elkins, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Henry Elkins

edit
 

Hello, Jake.hackley. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Henry Elkins".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CatcherStorm talk 11:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Comparative Constitutions Project (September 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
-- NotCharizard 🗨 11:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Comparative Constitutions Project has been accepted

edit
 
Comparative Constitutions Project, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit

  Hi Jake.hackley! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Comparative Constitutions Project that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I appreciate the feedback. Those little tweaks seemed minor to me, but I see how others would have another interpretation. Jake.hackley (talk) 19:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply