Welcome

edit
Hello Jacob cannon, and Welcome to Wikipedia! 

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Jacob cannon, good luck, and have fun. --Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Jacob cannon ,you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 
Hello! Jacob cannon, you're invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse – an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:22, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 2012 UEFA Euro under-21 youth cup Final

edit
 

The article 2012 UEFA Euro under-21 youth cup Final has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Complete mess. Contains mentions at least 3 teams (Croatia, Chelsea and Bayern Munich), the reference (broken) goes to a Newcastle United website, and lists multiple players who are not under 21 e.g Drogba. Delete per WP:V.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tassedethe (talk) 16:43, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Diego Starčević

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Diego Starčević, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Struway2 (talk) 12:21, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

September 2012

edit

  This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at hoax pages, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Raymond Cachia

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Raymond Cachia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cindy(talk to me) 12:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of André Coimbra-Boas for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article André Coimbra-Boas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/André Coimbra-Boas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Peter James (talk) 00:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  RA (talk) 01:20, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked for creating hoax articles at Antonio Cachia, André Coimbra-Boas and Sergio Benítez. --RA (talk) 01:20, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply