User talk:J Milburn/archive3

This is an archive of past discussions. Please do not edit it, it is for reference purposes only. If you wish to continue a discussion here, please do so on my talk page.

Your album template

I think the template could be useful, if only occasionally. As such, I recommend taking it to WP space. Not sure what you'll call it, but I say go for it. -Freekee 04:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

DYK

On February 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gordon Park, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions J Milburn.Blnguyen  (bananabucket) 04:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Voltaire

I asked Voltaire via email about his religious views. I don't have the email any more, unfortunately.

Hagmans horror

Hi there, well it did seem to be nonsense but thanks for the advice, it does seem to be nonsense to me though, thanks for your opinions and happy editing.Tellyaddict 18:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not create attack pages

Please do not make personal attacks on other people as you did at User:J Milburn/Eternal Decision. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by E tac (talk • contribs) 11:41, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Note: This warning was irrelevant as that user subpage was clearly written in character (which was also stated on the page). –mysid☎ 11:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Nandini

I had decided to give the User:Kaustuv a chance to change the article. It is now an article solely about a character in Hindu mythology.--Jersey Devil 20:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Quaker Council for European Affairs

I've added some more stuff from the QCEA website. Perhaps you could consider withdrawing your claim that the article does not demonstrate the Notability of QCEA., This additional information was only a click away from you. I am hoping that the WikiProject on Quakers will add some links. ===Vernon White (talk) 20:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

You replied

I have removed the notability tag, but it would be nice if you could use some reliable, third party, published, non-trivial sources, as is explained here so as to prove that the group is definately notable. J Milburn 21:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

.

Do you really think that an NGO recognised by the European Union and the Council of Europe and has played a significant part in lining up single-issue NGOs to deal with major issues together is "not Notable"? WP:criteria seem a bit narrow-minded to me (except of course for garage-bands and electronic games, TV soaps etc.)! ==

You replied:

Right, if we are going to get picky- their website says that they did that. Let's take the metaphorical Joe Bloggs. He is recognised by the English government as an English citizen, and, due to the three protests he has attented, is (according to his blog site) 'instrumental' in banning fox hunting, preventing the local school being closed, and banning a logging firm from cutting down the local woods. Also, he was a 'majot player' in getting Labout into power. (Well, he voted for them, and persuaded his wife to do the same...) Now do you see why the policy is needed? You are, of course, welcome to debate said policy, but, until the policy is overruled, it is probably best to stick to it. Now, if the group is half as notable as the website makes out, it would be stupendously easy to find a couple of sources. If they were this instrumental in the various things they claim to be, surely the broadsheets of most of Europe will have featured stories on them at some point? Also, they will be pasted all over the web. Or, is the organisation just a group of Quakers who thought they would turn up at a couple of protests? (Two notes- first of all, I have full respect for the Quaker movement, it was formed locally to me, and I know a few Quakers, all of whom I have found to be wonderful people. Secondly, I have no doubt the group is notable, I am just playing the Devil's advocate and using extreme examples, in an attempt to improve the article, and the encyclopedia as a whole.) Message me if I can be of any help! J Milburn 21:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

.

. . . but your reductio ad absurdum doesn't work because QCEA has had to persuade some very stingy Quakers (no longer Chocolate Magnates or Banking Barons) to fund Quaker House in Brussels and three or four staff since 1979. There is significant external reportage of QCEA's successes but it is not readily available on the 'net. QCEA appears to "do good by stealth".

BTW I think quite a few Quakers are also devotees of the Invisible Pink Unicorn or have, at least long abandoned any traditional theological concepts (e.g. Jocelyn Bell Burnell). Have you visited Swarthmoor Hall? ===Vernon White (talk) 22:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I've told QCEA about a small typo on their site and asked them to look at the WP Qcea article. I hope other members of the Quaker WikiProject will contribute. BTW have you any views on the British replacement of the Trident system article === Vernon White (talk) 22:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Pacific Conference

Hey, you just brought up on my first article that I needed some sources for it. Could you go back and check it now to see if that is enough. If not, can you help me out? Scoreboard 22:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

It is more or less a sports league. The 6 schools are all in the same league. I go to one of the schools, so when I saw that our league didn't have a page, I thought I would make one, to kind of have a center point. Also, the first source called OSAA districts, check again and look in the 6A column on the left. The schools are listed there.

Well there are articles that mention the conference all the time in the local weekly paper, and then main local paper publishes league standings and scores from games all the time. Do I need to somehow find links to these stories?Scoreboard 22:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I was able to find an article from last year describing the conference. Will this be sufficient for the notability guidelines? Scoreboard 02:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

OK

Alright. I'll give that to you. Without any images or colors, it just looks like another person that doesn't know what they're doing. Sorry. Thank you. Wikipedian27 22:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Warnings

Alright. I see what you're saying, but this guy isn't going to stop. If you just watch his contributions page, it's just going to be more vandalism. Wikipedian27 22:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Nuclear Cumbria

Thanks for your comments on my TalkPage concerning QCEA. In relation to the British replacement of the Trident system article, I was just thinking that you might have a useful contribution to the debate from a local point of view. See Deterrence theory and The ends justify the means. Do "x" number of local jobs with an excellent employer (in marginal constituencies) justify going against a commitment to the non-proliferation treaty? Do the means (Deterrence) distort the ends (a free, just and democratic society)? === Vernon White (talk) 08:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your message on my Userpage. ===Vernon White (talk) 16:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Trivium

Hi, I didn't realise I was infringing copyright, so I appologize for that! Would it be alright to have the Trivium logo, either official logo or someone's fan art on it? As these are both freely available to download from the Trivium website. Thanks Asics talk 11:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok, how about a still from a video? Would that be allowed? Or even one of their AIM icons? Are any of those allowed? Asics talk 11:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

How about now, are these alright? Asics talk 11:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I just had to edit one little bit because it said Dungeons and Dragons instead of Trivium :-D! Apart from that it looks great! Asics talk 12:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Procedure

Because he vandalized since your template. That wasn't for the warning you gave him. Wikipedian27 13:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Geographical features of Askam and Ireleth

How about mentioning the streams etc of Askam and Ireleth + Askam Wood (Should be Ireleth Wood or Bird's Wood) in the article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheTrojanHought (talk • contribs) 17:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC).

Engine (album)

I'm editing the page at the moment and I only started it half an hour ago! Sfgreenwood 17:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Reina

Why not Reina?--Agrofe 18:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Glad to see that there is agreements on notariety for this article. Dont forget to remove the delete recommend :-).--Agrofe 20:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Autism Sunday

Oops, edit summary dropped off. Anyway "The first ever Service for Autism was held in February 2002 at St.Paul's Cathedral in London." with "Peers from the House of Lords" and "Churches of all denominations around the world now remember the 60 million people with autism on Autism Sunday known as the International Day of Prayer for Autism and Asperger's Syndrome" are claims of international and political recognition. Therefore, a speedy based on 'no assertion of notability' is inappropriate. Nuttah68 20:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

TBH, no it's not worth an AfD. Tag it for sources/wikify/cleanup etc but a quick google search found this, http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/womanshour/2002_01_thu_02.shtml, and endless international blog mentions. Nuttah68 20:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Iceland Presidential Election

The article (I'm not the author) that you have tried twice to speedy on different grounds has exactly the analogous content to all the other articles on Icelandic presidential elections, which are listed in the chronobox.Didnt you check? No context? The context is Iceland. Speedy on this was not justified at all. Please don't hamper the effective use of speedy by over-using it. I see you want to be come an admin.; you might well get there, but only if you work is a little more careful. DGG 22:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Check some other election articles for other countries. They are all constructed just the same. Your dissatisfaction appears to be with the WP policy on how articles on the subject should be written. You are certainly welcome to disagree, and, if you think it worthwhile, try to change the policy--there might be consensus for changing it. But the way to express it is to bring it up on article talk pages, or on the talk pages for the infoboxes, And then, if you still want to change it, open a discussion on it at the Village Pump. Personally, I'd advise doingagainst doing that unless you think you'll have support on that particular issue. I have some policy disagreements, but I havent brought up any there until I have one that I think will succeed.

It is almost certainly not a good idea to express your personal views on policy by speedies. Remember that speedy is only for uncontestable articles--if you think there might be any problem, or that anyone might reasonably disagree, you should use prod or afd. I use prod for borderline cases, so others have a chance to see and comment. WP::CSD--"these criteria are worded narrowly and such that in most cases, reasonable editors will agree what does or does not fall under a given criterion. Where reasonable doubt exists, discussion using another method under deletion policy is recommended. "

Also "Before nominating an article for speedy deletion, consider whether an article could be improved or reduced to a stub; speedy deletion is for cases where an article does not contain useful content" -- I think tis means that an improvable stub should never be listed for speedy. Most people dont list them even for prod, unless a few month of trying havent brought improvement. The deletion process is not intended for poor quality articles, just articles that shouldnt be in WP at all. (Typically, if I see a bad article, i will spend at least a few minutes trying to improve it at least a little)

There are various proposals at various places to end or sharply limit the use of speedy because of this sort of problem. I think it a useful procedure in obvious cases, and I would not like to see that happen. DGG 23:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I didn't see your latest note until I posted this. I wouldn't have written it quite the same way if I had. Apologies. DGG 23:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar of Music

		The Barnstar of Music
		Awarded to J Milburn for your exceptional knowledge of Wikipedia guidelines and your ability to articulate them, and for your contributions to music-related articles! :) Cricket02 23:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Note

People like that, who are not willing to educate themselves about Wikipedia policies, are not worth arguing with, really. Just let the polices you cite speak for themselves and spare yourself the grief.  :) I want to thank you too, I've learned alot from you.  :) Cricket02 19:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Don't Worry about it

I know I can be a little defensive when editing, especially when it comes to my own work being challeged. Perhaps I should be thanking you because in a way you challenging the article helped me make it a better one.--E tac 19:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

• • I have to agree there! My first article was horrible, full of NPOV and lack of sources, and editors made me so mad by adding the maintenance tags - but.....that just made me work on it more and more and finally after 5 months it became a GA. The more I read the policies, the more they made complete sense. So yes, we do need people like you J. and you are much appreciated :) Cricket02 20:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm honored!

Thank you!  :) I've only begun to feel confident enough to start helping with other articles here, but have lurked for quite some time so have seen you around and have always been in awe of your knowledge and wit and self-confidence to stand up for what you believe in. Hang in there, you will do great things in life, and have a good start on it already. Cricket02 20:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Help with moving

I need help getting these pages straightened out, can you help? The user seems to have moved the article to his talk page, etc., and I've probably messed things up even further. Charles Timberlake and talk page, and User:Timbers and talk page. Cricket02 15:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I left a copyvio speedy message on the article and what I thought was his talk page (Timbers), but realized it was moved to article page, now he's moved it back, and (I'm confused now). Anyway, the copyvio message is gone from the article and he's removed his talk page again...I dunno. It seems he thinks his user page is supposed to be his article page. Please see: [1]. Cricket02 17:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind, User:Kafziel went in and straightened things out it looks like.  :) Cricket02 17:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Unterseeboot 87 disambigious pages

Hello,

I understand your principle but a lot of Underseeboot pages contains disambigious content and that is why I am creating disambigious pages to prevent this from happening even more. It is confusing and much more difficult to clean up later. I can't see it as a problem since the disambigious page contains info. about the different U-boats. Look at other shipindex pages. It is done the same way.

I still don't agree with you since it should be a disambigious page bacause part of the Military History project is to document every U-boats and all 3 or 4 designations of U-boats has been used, but should be documented on separate pages. Maybe you should consult with the Military History project for references. Keallu 11:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry that you don't get the point here. It is a proper disambigious page since the sub-pages will be created shortly and the reference will be correct. Keallu 12:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem. That's part of the large Military History project. We are categorizing and making diamb pages but also writing the articles. Keep up the good work! Keallu 12:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Does (album) tagged as unreferenced

Hi, You tagged an album article I created, Does (album), as unreferenced. I got all the info directly from the cd liner notes, so how do I reference this? I'm fairly new to wikipedia so any help would be apprectiated. Cheers Strobilus 19:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the prompt reply. I can cite a couple of website's for most of the info. What is the stand way of formatting the references? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Strobilus (talk • contribs) 19:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC).

I added references to two websites that cover all the same info. Hope that helps. Strobilus 19:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Aeluros Inc

Why did you remove the speedy delete tag? As far as I can see, there was no assertion of notability, even on the talk page? J Milburn 20:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

The comments made by author it refers to a company that manufactures state of the art components for networking infrastructure and is a significant contributor to the maturing 10 gigabit ethernet standard. is significant enough to remove speedy delete tag. I would recommend to nominate it for AfD. Regards, Shyam ^(T/C) 20:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

J: I want to thank you for your latest note re: the afD debate and note a couple more things. I have been a user(reader) of wikipedia for 2 years now. It took me a while till I decided to contribute some things on subjects that I know. For a couple of months now I have been editing tech articles anonymously with very uncontroversial results, till last week. While your initial reaction was justified and the new page patrol is a worthy goal, you can imagine my surprise when 5 minutes after I saved the first draft it got slapped with a deletion tag. I should note that (i) perhaps I should have done the initial edit in a sandbox, and (ii) due to the deletion tag the article is much improved now. However the article might have reached the same state if you just wrote to to me about notability and references and gave me a day or two to fix it. Depending on the authors' mood the speedy deletion process can quickly degenerate to an unnecessary flame war, despite the fact that the process might have started with good intentions. Please consider that tactic in the future. Anyway, keep up the good work and best regards. E2550 01:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

deletion of Oxford digital library

I'm not sure why you through up a speedy deletion tag and why an admin deleted the content and redirected this article. You're reason for doing so was:

Non notable website- it would probably best serve as a redirect, but I can't work out where to. There is no article covering all of the Oxford libraries.

When doing a google search of "Oxford Digital Library" (with quotes) I get more than 13,000 results. The digital library contains digitized material covered over the past 400 years. I'm forced to strongly disagree with throwing up a speedy deletion tag. If you don't mind I'll be restoring the article. If you would like to nominate the article for deletion feel free to do so, but I think it would be wise to gain consensus first. Chupper 21:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

As you were restoring the redirect I was moving the content over. Would it be bad to just simply move the content from the Bodleian Library article and put it in Oxford digital library? Chupper 21:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

See my sandbox - User:Chupper/Sandbox02 Chupper 21:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Well alrighty then. And I thought I was a deletionist... Although I disagree, you're the admin. Chupper 21:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Gotcha. I was getting you confused with the other guy. I mean if it is being deleted for lack of notability, that's one thing. But if it's being deleted because it's a stub, and information is written in another bigger article about it, then why does Wikipedia have stubs in the first place? I don't know. I won't push my opinion though, primarily because I don't have any knowledge about this subject. Happy wikipediaing :). Chupper 22:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

PKK and LTTE

My idea for articles about attacks by terrorist groups is to use the term "List of NAME attacks". NAME is the name of terrorist group. It should be a standard name of category in Wikipedia. If you try to find an analogue of PKK, we should remember LTTE. LTTE is the Sri Lankan version of PKK. They are similar; one can say the major differences are their countries and names. I can give evidence for this. What I was trying to change was the name "Turkish-Kurdish conflict" for a more proper name, not the article's text. If there is two identical twin groups, names should be similar. If you call one article “Terrorist attacks by LTTE/PKK Sri Lanka Version", another one as "Causalities of Kurdish-Turkish conflict", it is not objective. I think names - excluding the word "terror"-, should be changed into "attacks by LTTE/PKK Sri Lanka Version", and "Attacks by LTTE/PKK Turkey Version". (My name using the word terror for this article is not good). Former name was "Civilian casualties caused by PKK"; it was not founded as objective. (But, in LTTE and ETA articles this name is used and it is not founded as against objectivity.) Now, the name is "Causalities of Turkish-Kurdish conflict" which is not objective.

"Turkish-Kurdish conflict" name is not suitable for the article name because there is not an ethnic conflict. Do you have any proof for this? There is a Kurdish problem in Turkey. PKK, a Marxist group supported by some Kurds attacks Army, Kurdish feudal forces that support government and civilians. This is not a ethnic conflict because in Turkey, there is not a political tension between Turkish and Kurdish speaking groups. They make marriages; many Kurds live in areas with huge Turkish population. There are Kurdish speaking ministers, i. e. Mehdi Eker. To name this problem as a "Turkish-Kurdish conflict" is not objective, it is pure PKK propaganda. For example in India there was "Muslim-Hindu conflict", people were killing each other. It is not the same as Kurdish problem in Turkey. (See Mustafa Akyol’s book on Kurdish problem in Turkey.)

My proof for PKK/LTTE similarity is : http://www.saag.org/papers19/paper1865.html

Note: In Sri Lanka case, religion is different between groups. But, organization of terrorist groups are very similar. "Attacks by PKK" is suitable for name, isn't it?Paparokan 23:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

RE: List of Scottish footballers

Hi there. Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I was just scraping from the category really. I'll go through the rest at some point. My main aim is to get West Ham player articles linked from an appropriate 'List of Foo footballers' page, which is going to mean creating a few of these I guess. All the best. - Nzd (talk) 12:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Simple page

J Milburn wrote on my talk page:

Can I ask why you created this page? It is dangerously close to violating this guideline. Please reply on my own talk page. J Milburn 12:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I created that page Simple page as a copy of meta:Simple page because it was referenced and included by Help:A simple composite example. I created Help:A simple composite example as a copy of m:Help:A simple composite example because it was referenced (as the first link in section Help:Template#Composite_pages) by Help:Template, which was copied from m:Help:Template multiple times over the years. Help:Template says very specifically at the top of it "This is a copy of the master meta page at Meta. Do not edit this copy." and "Edits will be lost in the next update from the master page. See below for more information." Instead of going down the Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point and Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion roads, I have now edited Help:Template and m:Help:Template to make the link m:Help:A simple composite example instead. Thanks for your concern. Also, please reply here, to keep the conversation in one place.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok, that makes sense. Remember that blanking a page does not delete it- so I have nominated the page for speedy deletion again. J Milburn 13:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Dutch german friendship day

Deleting the article might have been the correct course of action - but A7 doesn't apply there. CSD A7 is for groups, people and web content - which events don't fall under. Use prod or AfD instead. ColourBurst 15:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

The Crockett Times

J Milburn flagged this article for citing references and notability. Thanks for pointing that out - I'm new. I've added a reference from the Tennessee State Library and Archives, a genealogy website, and the website of Congressman John Tanner (US House of Representatives). The Crockett Times has been a (sometimes the) primary source of information for its community. The article is still a stub; but I'm working on it. Thanks again, Will.

Given names

I would suggest you to arrange a wikiproject "Given names" and process the whole Category:Given names in an orderly fashion, inviting interested people. After some trivial names deleted, quite possible they will be recreated, so I'd suggest to discuss the criteria of existence of such articles, possibly merging related, such as Alexander and Alexandra, Alessandra and clearly separating given name articles and disambiguation articles. `'mikka 00:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Impalement arts

Sorry it's taken me a while to get the hang of replying. I wrote the Impalement Arts entry from scratch (using sources which I hope I have fully attributed in the entry). Thanks for your positive comments. I'm used to rigorous requirements for referencing from academic study in recent years. I also like to think I'm fairly rigorous with style and format because I used to produce websites for a living as well as working as an editor.

I've made an edit to the Knife throwing page to include a link back to the Impalement arts entry. Also removed a small amount of content that was duplicated there and is probably better within Impalement arts rather than in Knife throwing - which I suggest is now devoted to the mechanics of throwing and to the competitive sport side of things. Circusandmagicfan 00:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Circusandmagicfan

Leader of the Band

Please do not delete information. The song is tagged as a memorial song, this tag will not work if it is a redirect to the artist. That is why the song was pulled out in the first place, and I was planning on expanding it later, that should make all parties happy. --22:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Aversion bmx

How can i Change the information to be any more neutral. It details everything about aversion - although not particularly deeply as of yet - it will grow

Re: Emo (slang

Thank you very much. Steevven1 ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery)} 02:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: user reporting

Thank you for the suggestion. I'll have to figure out where the right spot to report a user is and then how to move the page. JazzyGroove 03:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Sandbox

Yah your right about the sandbox, but how exactly do I use sandbox? Sorry bout the page creation, I plan on updating it more and more (:O(, thanks for remind me about sandbox, but how do i use it again (:O) -nima baghaei 17:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• Sweet! Thanks so much! (:O) -nima baghaei 18:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• Woww! yes that is awesome, the more sources the better! (:O) -nima baghaei 18:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: tag? deletion

I don't have the slightest idea what you're talking about? What is a what-ever you said?

I haven't deleted anything

--Brylcreem2 18:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I only wrote "Didsbury Park" to see if the page functioned correctly. And it did, so sorry for any inconvenience I have caused. --Brylcreem2 18:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

NO!

--Brylcreem2 19:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean? --Brylcreem2 19:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Picture of year confirmation

Just to confirm I just voted for pictures 52, 103, 114, 253, 267, as an anonymous IP, in the Commons picture of the year. J Milburn 21:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

SD Nomination of Compete, Inc

I noticed that you nominated the article for notability reasons. However, the author was only in the beginning stages of the article, having just completed the info box. Articles are not always in perfect form after one edit. Some authors will start small and then add more. As a result, I removed the SD tag from the article in order to give the author a chance to add some content. It may not end up being notable enough, but I suggest at least giving the author a chance to write the article before it is nominated. Cyrus Andiron 19:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Den Ham (disambiguation)

There is a criterium for speedy deletion for dab pages with just one link, but I think that one is meant to be used in clean up if an unencyclopedic article is deleted. If the links on the dab page point to possible encyclopedic articles, in my opinion the page is already useful by pointing out that there are several possible meanings; such a page should not be deleted, I think.

Having said that, I will create one or two of the missing articles. -- Eugène van der Pijll 16:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning; I'll try to make sure that there are at least two blue links on each page. (As tehre are now on Den Ham (disambiguation). -- Eugène van der Pijll 16:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Isaac Peyrere

I removed the notability tag because it's explained in the article.

The main accomplishment for which Pereyre is remembered by history is his writing out phonetically, according to modern French phonetics, the transliteration of the Mahzor (holiday prayerbook) of the Jewish community of Bayonne and Bordeaux.

Since it's explained, and sourced I removed the tag. Feel free to contest. It's not my article but I'll come visit it again. --Walter Görlitz 21:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Pereyre's transliteration is notable, because Prof. Bar-Asher published a two-volume study of it. Margavriel 07:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

China UFO

• Hey! Can you give you opinion on the BURO article because someone has requested it be deleted, yet they dont give a good reason for it! Its an official government sponsered organization! Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Beijing_UFO_Research_Organization (:O) -nima baghaei 18:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Kirk Speraw

• Hi there. I responded to your notability concern for the Kirk Speraw page. Just as a follow-up, Coach Speraw is the head basketball coach at the 6th largest University in the United States. He is one of 12 head coaches in Conference USA (Where the Associated Press #7 team in the Country, Memphis, plays)

Other coaches in that conference have information on Wikipedia, including Mike Davis, Larry Eustachy, Tom Penders, Matt Doherty, and John Calipari. I have added more information to cite his notability, please let me know if I need to add more. Garyucf 19:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Your comment on my talkpage

Thank you. I promise to keep helping the article. --Releeshan 23:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Feather (Mario)

Hi, I didn't know where to put it, but it's easier to find if it has an article of its own anyway. gameguider 12:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

re Allip

My dear, neutraly weaked means "Neutrale malvagio" or "Neutraly evil".. "Malvagio=weaked", right? kiss flavio/Tigre reietta 20:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

re: Spam Whitelist

Hi, you added two of Voltaire's blog entries (on MySpace) to the whitelist for me, so I have just come to say thanks. However, I am not great with how URLs work, and I am not a MySpace user, and you picked me up on adding a 'userID' or something to the URL. Basically, what I am asking is, would it be possible to put his whole blog on the whitelist, or would I have to request individual unblocks every time I want to use an entry as a source? Thanks. J Milburn 18:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, the myspace ID is your personal number. I learned that the hard way when trying to view the link you sent. No problems.

Well, MySpace has a retarded linking system. I can't just whitelist one blog without whitelisting every blog on myspace. So yeah... just keep sending the requests over. :) ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 18:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)