JRE0306

This is JRE0306's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome! edit

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, JRE0306, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Mario Restrepo (September 17) edit

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need inline citations. Please read WP:INCITE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juan Mario Restrepo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, JRE0306! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Mario Restrepo (November 3) edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ldm1954 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many issues:

1) We need independent sources for his career. His CV is not independent. 2) Contrary to what was previously stated, an APS Fellow is not notable enough, there are too many each year. SIAM maybe, although there were 26 in 2022.

3) While a DOE young investigator award is good for a career, it is not notable enough. 4) A long list of publications with brief descriptions does not prove notability. 5) There are major format issues that need to be addressed. 6) Things like his working in the music industry have no place here. 7) Almost no sources to verify his career, most of which is not relevant.

Please read carefully WP:NACADEMIC and rewrite this as carefully and rigorously as you would a SIAM paper (perhaps a bit less waffling than some papers). Assume that you will be peer reviewed on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juan Mario Restrepo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 01:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear Ldm 1954

I truly appreciate your patience and your helpful suggestions. Most importantly, your editorial help...less is more...

I cut the text substantially and removed superfluous narrative. I hope I got the reference style correctly.

Regarding references to my work, the chosen items from peer-reviewed journals. I might be misunderstanding what you prefer, if this is not what is used.

My reference to my web site/CV is to my official web page on the US Department of Energy Laboratory. It is already vetted and it is public.

Regarding notability, awards, etc. A referee took exception to a fellowship at the American Physical Society. This is the premier physics society worldwide, so other than being a US Academy member, it is the highest vote of professional confidence for physicists. Moreover, the SIAM Geoscience Prize mentioned is given as a recognition of worldwide intellectual contributions in an area of applied mathematics with a specialty in geosciences. Other awards are noted, also prestigious within my mathematics and physics communities.

I submit a newly edited submittal, and thank you for your patience. I took over the submission of the page, as my colleague felt I could better address the issues.

Juan M. Restrepo JRE0306 (talk) 16:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic