JOHJOL5

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Rutland Gallery (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Rutland Gallery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, JOHJOL5! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Rutland Gallery (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Rutland Gallery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

I'm now starting to feel like Jeremy Clarkson I.e. no matter what I do the authorities are no going to approve my inclusion.

You have again refused my entry and yet you approve this one? I have almost verbatim used similar wording and layout. If you can kindly tell me where my post is going wrong when the 2 posts are similar.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mica_Gallery JOHJOL5 (talk) 14:41, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

First off not every article goes through the AFC process and some do get past the New Page patrols. I agree with you, the MIca Gallery article is insufficient as well therefore I have nominated it for removal. Each article must stand on it's own to merits not what may or may not exist elsewhere, see Wikipedia:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS . McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Rutland Gallery (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Rutland Gallery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:17, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Draft:The Rutland Gallery deleted

Calling a gallery "a must-see destination", "a beautiful space", "a true gem", "a fantastic place" and so forth is blatantly promotional; I have therefore deleted the draft you constructed. -- Hoary (talk) 06:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for considering the entry. Can you please reinstate the draft and I will remove all the adjectives amd what as you say appears to be blatant promotion. Thank you. JOHJOL5 (talk) 11:19, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Done -- but on the understanding that you'll take a hard look at this, with my "and so forth" (above) in mind. -- Hoary (talk) 12:27, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I'll be pleased to make the amendments next week. JOHJOL5 (talk) 13:16, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Rutland Gallery (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Rutland Gallery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 01:24, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Adjectives and sentences that appeared to be promotional have now been removed. If any other changes need to be made then please let me know. Thanks. JOHJOL5 (talk) 09:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, JOHJOL5. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:The Rutland Gallery, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your consideration although I feel that no matter what is done to this entry you will continue to refuse its inclusion. I have to say that this baffles me when I compare it with existing entries of a similar nature.

As for your reference to an entry in The Sunday Times newspaper... I never realised that this was part of the criteria for approval?

As a side note the gallery is hosting a charity event this Thursday evening where up to 150 visitors will be viewing just some of the permanent collection. I look forward to letting them know that Wikipedia dont feel that The Rutland Gallery (in the county of Rutland) don't warrant entry!!

Finally, I have donated financially to Wikipedia previously. I NEVER did this to try and buy favour. Please rest assured however that I will be making no further contributions.

N.B. I will be making to further edits to the article as it warrants inclusion in it's current form. JOHJOL5 (talk) 07:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

None of that answers my COI query. Please respond to that. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Rutland Gallery (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Rutland Gallery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

As I said I'm not spending any more time on this. I will be making no further comments/edits. JOHJOL5 (talk) 08:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

As you wish. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Please delete the article JOHJOL5 (talk) 08:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)