Your submission at Articles for creation: Remitly (March 25) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, JM at Remitly! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Remitly edit

I've just answered your concerns at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Finance & Investment#Remitly AfC Draft Review. Thank you for declaring and following all the proper procedures on Wikipedia. You can check Remitly now.

I have actually used your service before and enjoyed it, in addition to your competitors like Wise.com and WorldRemit. Remitly is good for Kenya and the Philippines, but some of the other countries are actually better served by your competitors due to regulations, fees, and other reasons. Of course, it's not easy running a remittance company these days, so I can understand.

In any case, let me know if you have any further concerns regarding the Wikipedia article. MSteinburg (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply