Ishtiaquewwf

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Toxin (comics) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Toxin (comics) was changed by Ishtiaquewwf (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895367 on 2016-03-03T17:32:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:32, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Widr (talk) 18:21, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 2028— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 16:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2028 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 2028 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ishtiaque Ahmed

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ishtiaque Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Adolf Hitler. Dcirovic (talk) 17:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 21:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ishtiaquewwf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

reason: I thought I was contributingIshtiaquewwf (talk) 09:54, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No you didn't. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ishtiaquewwf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Okay I wasn't but for the toxin comic I was and it just got deleted so I got annoyed and started doing stupid things but I promise I won't do it againIshtiaquewwf (talk) 14:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Given this gem, I do not believe that a collaborative project of this sort is for you, nor do I believe unblocking you would be in the best interest of Wikipedia. Kinu ^t/_c 19:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, Wikipedia is not a place to get annoyed and do stupid things. FixCop (talk) 15:15, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

so does this mean I'll be unblocked soon User:Ishtiaquewwf (talk) 18:59, 22 May 2016

If you create an unblock request that explains this crap, then we will think about it. I'm not an admin, so I can't unblock you. FixCop (talk) 20:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ishtiaquewwf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I just want to aid Wikipedia and promise not to make anymore stupid editsIshtiaquewwf (talk) 16:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you

1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you were unblocked, what edits would you make? FixCop (talk) 17:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ishtiaquewwf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand why I have been blocked and I promise to make only productive edits to Wikipedia and I won't vandalise it.Ishtiaquewwf (talk) 17:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Giving the user one more chance. Widr (talk) 17:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

• I'm not against giving you one more chance, but you should realize that there will be several eyes watching your edits. If you don't keep your word and make constructive edits, you will only end up getting blocked again. Widr (talk) 17:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

User:ishtiaquewwf (talk) I promise to make only constructive edits this time 18:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Unblocked

I've unblocked you now. Hope I won't have to regret it. Happy editing. Widr (talk) 17:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks User:ishtiaquewwf (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dhaffir Harris

Hello Ishtiaquewwf,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dhaffir Harris for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 18:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Dhaffir Harris

Hi. Your article on Dhaffir Harris was speedily deleted because you were not able to convincingly demonstrate the subject's notability. Wikipedia is not a directory, and just because a person has had a couple of roles in a film does not make him a notable actor. I have an imdb page of my own, having had a major role in two episodes of a nationally broadcast television show, but this does not entitle me to my own Wikipedia page. If you can show that Harris "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", you will probably succeed with an article about him, but I do not think you will be able to do this. His imdb page was pretty light. ubiquity (talk) 19:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

How many references do you think I need before I can post about him. ishtiaquewwf (talk) 16:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

What if I make a draft and send it to you for checking. ishtiaquewwf (talk) 16:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

I made the Dhaffir Harris page again with more details and references and Wikipedia didn't delete it this time. ishtiaquewwf (talk) 18:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ishtiaquewwf, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Widr (talk) 18:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)