Irishgeek

Petits chanteurs du mont-royal

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Petits chanteurs du mont-royal, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.pcmr.ca/infog_e.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:54, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Petits-Chanteurs du Mont-Royal. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of WEFUNK Radio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WEFUNK Radio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WEFUNK Radio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gorrad (talk) 20:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with WEFUNK Radio. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

I understand why you removed it, and I agree that consensus seems to support keeping the article.

You may not be familiar with the way our Articles for deletion process works. After seven days, an administrator who hasn't taken part in the deletion discussion will formally close it. It is that administrator's responsibility to remove the notice. The rest of us aren't supposed to remove it. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

"Bitch tits" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bitch tits has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 21 § Bitch tits until a consensus is reached. Significa liberdade (talk) 00:04, 21 October 2023 (UTC)