Welcome!

edit

Hello, Inzamul Sepoy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Inzamul Sepoy/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! creffett (talk) 12:31, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Inzamul Sepoy/sandbox

edit
 

A tag has been placed on User:Inzamul Sepoy/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. creffett (talk) 12:31, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. creffett (talk) 12:31, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Lockdown is not a Solution

edit

Lockdown, a way introduced in 21st century by CHINA, kept the whole world inside their homes. It is the first time we came to know that unity is harmful, we are safe, if we diversified.

But frequent lockdowns can put the economy is in danger zone where revive could be very difficult. Government should find out alternate solutions to curb the little problems like air pollution and global warming. Already we have faced many ups and downs during the first and second lockdown, GDP fell sharply, people got unemployed, number of BPL category people increased.

Not only people were financially devasted, morals of the people were severely affected.

People are living fearfully thinking of another lockdown may appear by the government. Lockdown was introduced by CHINA to tackle the situation of COVID-19. It was a temporary way to prepare for the emergency wave of COVID-19. Lockdown is not the ointment to put everywhere. Per day lockdown has its cost in crores which are the tax money of general public. Supply chain also blocked due to lockdown. Putting lockdown in every situation is like close your eyes and all the mess will be cleared. Pollution can be tackled by other ways without affecting the economy. Lots of people were died due to lockdown, suffering from mental disorders and financial problems. Government should find out other alternate solutions to fight air pollution or any other crisis because lockdown itself is a crisis. Inzamul Sepoy (talk) 08:11, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply