Infofreq
Welcome
editWelcome!
Hello, Infofreq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Aboutmovies (talk) 10:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there
editThanks for contributing that excellent article on weight loss, I certainly don't think it should be deleted or is overly-promotional. You probably don't realise that we get hundreds of terrible and completely promotional articles every day, so people can become a bit quick on the trigger after spending a long time dealing with the influx. Have you considered joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine? There are quite a few experienced editors that work in this field. Anyway, if I can help in any way in the future please drop me a note on my talkpage. All the best Tim Vickers (talk) 18:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, rather rude and ill-informed I'd say. I've finished merging your contributions into the Bariatrics article. Now with a single article it is much more comprehensive. I'd encourage you to expand this - you seem to have a good appreciation of the field. Tim Vickers (talk) 00:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- On your request I have courtesy blanked Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical weight loss. I agree that some of the comments were rather inappropriate. If you think that website (which I haven't looked at in detail) would be a good external link for the bariatrics article please add it. If you have any questions about what are appropriate external inks there is a guideline at Wikipedia:External links that explains what is the generally-accepted approach. Tim Vickers (talk) 04:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm very sorry that you got caught up in this. Medical articles are not usually so contentious! Tim Vickers (talk) 01:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article King 888 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King 888 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 23:22, 27 January 2012 (UTC)