ImogenCaroline

Welcome!

Hi ImogenCaroline! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

King Country tribes

Hi! I've noticed your edits to the articles for several cities in southern King County, thanks for making those improvements. Another editor has pointed out that the article on King County, Washington has no tribal information. I've ordered a book on the history of Washington to hopefully find content to fill that gap, but I thought I'd also mention it to you in case you have sources available and were interested. No obligation, of course. Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 15:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Kent, Washington, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SounderBruce 03:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

I do but you don't. The 2019 data is valuable. The expansion to the lead is valuable. Just because you don't think so, doesn't make it so. What you wrote above is a very nice example of projection. ImogenCaroline (talk) 03:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Also, as someone with a Master's degree in public policy and graduate level education in statistics, your notion re: census estimates is ludicrous! ImogenCaroline (talk) 04:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kent, Washington shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please start a talk page discussion if you wish to add material that does not conform with U.S. cities guidelines. SounderBruce 04:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

You are the owner who acts like an owner, and the only one who seems to have some kind of problem with info. that for whatever ideosynchartic reason you don't like. FYI: I was a wiki admin. when I was teenager so I know of the three revert rule. How about you use the discussion page BEFORE REMOVING content that's truthful and useful (I'll note that I've gotten thanks from two users for my additions to the Kent article). ImogenCaroline (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)