ImUrvashiRautela

ImUrvashiRautela, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ImUrvashiRautela! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Hello, I'm Mr. Stradivarius. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Urvashi Rautela, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 04:31, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Removing sourced material

In this edit, you removed sourced content without giving a reason. On Wikipedia, this kind of edit is usually reverted, and I've restored it for you. If you have a good reason to remove it, you should leave the reason in the edit summary. Perhaps it would be better just to move it further down in the article. It might not necessarily belong in the lead section. In any case, if you keep removing sourced material without explaining your reasons, it will probably end up with you getting blocked, so please be careful. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 23:34, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Urvashi Rautela without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Geniac (talk) 22:10, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Urvashi Rautela, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 05:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for repeatedly removing sourced material in an apparent attempt to use Wikipedia for advertising or promotion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Yunshui ^雲_水 08:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Urvashi Rautela. Shrikanthv (talk) 06:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Shrikanthv. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Urvashi Rautela without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Shrikanthv (talk) 06:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Urvashi Rautela, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 21:17, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Legal threat at User:ImUrvashiRautela/sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 21:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits to User:ImUrvashiRautela/sandbox could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 22:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Monty₈₄₅ 22:58, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:ImUrvashiRautela/sandbox

User:ImUrvashiRautela/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ImUrvashiRautela/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:ImUrvashiRautela/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC)