Joan of Arc

edit

Hi, could you provide a citation for your addition to Joan of Arc? Durova 04:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi -- I guess I can't, not right now. Until I find the book, I'll remove the section (if it hasn't been removed already.) Thanks! --Idols of Mud 13:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Rocky's departure

edit

Still in an edit war over this, if you haven't looked recently. You are completely correct, and the PBS doc is a very good source. Tvoz 21:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks -- I made many of the same points you did here, but didn't get a response. Oh well. Another admin's involved now, at least.--Idols of Mud 22:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

wow

edit

Cool photo of 1903 WS! -- Kingturtle (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Response

edit

at my talkpage. Mr Which??? 20:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Braveheart edits

edit

I didn't get a chance to do so at the time, but you were quick to provide a citable source for the comment in question, and I wanted to say that I appreciated your professionalism. Thanks. :)
Unfortunately, I think you missed the second part of the edit summary instruction, which was to note a citation that spoke to both Primae noctis to the film Braveheart. Finding a historical definition and reference to the practice of p.n. without connection to Braveheart forces you to make that connection in the article, and that act of connection is called synthesis. Synthesis isn't allowed in Wikipedia. I have to revert your contribution for now, but if you find a source that speaks to both Braveheart the film and the practice of p.n., please feel free to include it. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 20:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Happy Holidays

edit

Happy Holidays, Merry Christmas, etc. We once collaborated on a mystery here, it always stood out as one of the more memorable interactions I have had around here. :-) So, in the spirit of the holidays I just thought I would drop you line. --IvoShandor (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Memorable for me as well; thanks for the kind thoughts. And happy holidays.--Idols of Mud (talk) 19:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Phil Ochs

edit

Thanks for the kind words. I've been a fan of Phil's music for more than 30 years, so it's a pleasure writing about his songs. I'm glad people enjoy reading about them. :-) — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 02:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Romulus Augustus

edit

Hy there, I don't know if you are willing to go through with an "official move request". By the way the original title of the article was "Romulus Augustus" and NOT "Romulus Augustulus". Pmanderson seems intent in making a couple of sloppy mistakes. As far as I have been able to gather both names are equally popular and between an ancient nickname and the original official name/title I honestly would choose the second. Either way the issue is probably going to be debated in the next couple of days. Flamarande (talk) 00:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New York Herald Tribune, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William Seward and Benjamin Day (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up! -- --Idols of Mud (talk) 17:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New York Herald Tribune may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • (and the Democrats) in the [[United States presidential election, 1872]]|1872 presidential election]]. The editor had left daily operations of the ''Tribune'' to his protege, [[Whitelaw Reid]]; he
  • Pulitzer]], who came from St. Louis and purchased the [[New York World|World]] in 1882, overtook it), aggressively marketed a mix of crime stories and social reform editorials to a predominantly

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

New York Herald Tribune (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Republican Party, Tactics, Linotype, Equity and Stanley Walker

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of New York Herald Tribune

edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article New York Herald Tribune you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chris troutman -- Chris troutman (talk) 02:21, 3 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

I've already encountered a lot of issues in just the lede, as described here. I'm going to plow through the rest but I'm concerned that the citations aren't lining up as they should. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Appreciate the note, thanks. I'll go and back read to double-check the citations.--Idols of Mud (talk) 17:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of New York Herald Tribune

edit

The article New York Herald Tribune you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:New York Herald Tribune for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chris troutman -- Chris troutman (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Made (I think) most or all of these changes. Thanks so much.Idols of Mud (talk) 18:37, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of New York Herald Tribune

edit

The article New York Herald Tribune you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:New York Herald Tribune for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chris troutman -- Chris troutman (talk) 01:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Idols of Mud. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!

edit
  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!

Hello Idols of Mud, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018.
Happy editing,
Chris Troutman (talk) 00:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.