Icleamons
| This user is a student editor in George_Washington_University/AmWriting_Fall_2018_M_11_(Fall_2018) . |
Welcome!
editHello, Icleamons, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:21, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Notes
editHi, here are my notes:
- The table needs to be revamped. It should more resemble something like this. You can definitely copy code over from the Brave article's awards section and fine-tune it to fit the Amadeus article, if you were curious.
- I like the idea of a section on the historical accuracy of the film and I'm honestly surprised that this wasn't already there, so that's a good catch! My concern with this section is that it's written too much like a persuasive essay, as if you were building a case to get readers to see things in a certain light. It should more resemble the sections on articles like Amadeus#Historical_accuracy and Hamilton_(musical)#Historical_accuracy, as examples. I'm also concerned that the sourcing isn't about the movie, but rather generally about Amadeus. We can only summarize what the sourcing has stated about the film in specific. One big side note to all of this - when looking for sourcing about the film, make sure that it's about the film's historical accuracy and not only about the stage play, as that coverage would only be applicable to the stage play.
I hope this helps - my recommendation would honestly be to focus solely on the historical accuracy section for the time being and if you have time later, work on the table, as the historical accuracy part would be the bigger one to focus on. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:38, 3 December 2018 (UTC)