Iandharris
Welcome!
|
COI
edit
Hello, Iandharris. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --John (talk) 23:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --John (talk) 23:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. --John (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --John (talk) 00:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock}}
John, apologies that I saved this too soon - Supposed to list out the major consultancies - SMW, Arup, etc, but not yet finished. Reading the guidelines again, I was in error, in saving at this stage.
- Just so you know, arguing that because Arup Group Limited has a Wikipedia article, so should Global Technology Consultant is an entirely unconvincing reason to unblock you. In all seriousness, you need to accept that in order to be unblocked, you will have to agree not to edit any subject where you have a conflict of interest. PhilKnight (talk) 02:30, 4 October 2014 (UTC)PhN
Iandharris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Phil, I appreciate your feedback. Although I HAD assumed that because Arup and other Consultancies have Wikipedia pages, we also could (Arup, SMW amd ihD are the primary Technology Consultancies in Asia, but of course Arup is the largest and most venerable - several of my Team were with Arup previously), clearly I've made a hash of things. It was not my intention to break the rules nor be reckless, but I was careless in not sufficiently understanding the rules. Ironic, as I write Standards for the Hotel Groups, and for Technical magazines. For my part, I will carefully work through the guideline, and I commit to abiding by them. I respect you and John/Teams responsibility and authority, and abide by your final decision. My full contact details below, for the sake of accountability.
Thank You.
Decline reason:
I've removed the contact information, partially because the "|" character was breaking the formatting, and partially just we don't normally resolve these situations by email or phone call. Anyway, I'm declining this unblock request. If you agree not to edit articles related to your business, then you could be unblocked, however I think your unblock request falls short of providing this assurance. PhilKnight (talk) 18:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.