Hrhenderson
Help me!
editThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hrhenderson (talk) 01:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- The "Publish" button is really the "Save" button. The powers-that-be were fielding complaints from people who did not realize that once they have saved their edits on Wikipedia's servers, the work is public and viewable by anyone who knows where to look. So they imposed a name change on the button.
- When using the article wizard, you'll be asked to "submit" your draft for review. Only after it has been reviewed and accepted does it become an "article" on the main encyclopedia.
- So feel free to use the "Publish" button! — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 01:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Paid-contribution disclosure
editThe Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Help me!
editThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hi friends, I am writing an article for an organization that I work for (paid contributor). I have disclosed this on my talk page, but I am uncertain if this is sufficient disclosure. Do I put it on the draft article page as well somewhere before I submit it for review? Thanks! Hrhenderson (talk) 19:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- That template is supposed to go on the (draft) article's talk page; I'm going to put it there (with a link to your edit here). There is also Template:Paid which you can put on your user page (User:Hrhenderson). Thanks for making sure you comply with the disclosure requirements, and happy editing. Huon (talk) 20:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Welcome!
editHello, Hrhenderson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Gleeanon409 (talk) 19:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
I took a very quick look at your draft and have some comments:
- There should be no external links (to websites other than Wikipedia) in the body of the article. Having a single external link to the Institute's website in a dedicated "External links" section at the end of the draft (after even the "References" section) is appropriate; all others should be removed outright. See WP:External links for the relevant policies.
- Wikipedia content should be a summary of what reliable third-party sources have reported about the subject. If the source for a statement such as "IGI also periodically gives information and comments on proposed regulation of genome editing technology to governing bodies including the FDA" is one such comment by IGI, then firstly I rather doubt it confirms the statement (does that one comment really say anything about the frequency with which IGI comments?), and secondly it gives the impression that no one else cares about that aspect of IGI's activities - then Wikipedia shouldn't cover it either. Things would be quite different if there were, for example, a newspaper article describing how IGI's comment influenced the FDA regulation.
- Sources that do not mention IGI at all or are trivial passing mentions that provide no information about it (for example because they were written years before IGI was founded, or because the only mentions of IGI are in the authors' affiliations) are useless for an article about IGI.
I hope this helps. Huon (talk) 20:46, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Innovative Genomics Institute (March 7)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Innovative Genomics Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Innovative Genomics Institute, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Hrhenderson!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 21:49, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
|
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Innovative Genomics Institute, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:23, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Innovative Genomics Institute
editHello, Hrhenderson. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Innovative Genomics Institute, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 02:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)