Hoots Mon

Hoots Mon, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Hoots Mon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks to contributors

I think that I'm through with this subject now. When I first accessed it, I was so disappointed that my favourite loco had such scant and unreferenced information. I've tried to do these 8Ps justice and I'd like to express my admiration for the guys who wrote Liveries, Accidents and Incidents and Stock List (which I renamed List of Locos, sorry!). I realise that this is an open site and that others may wish to do what I have already done, so look after it, folks. Hoots Mon (talk) 22:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Jenkinson page nos.

I have quoted page nos in Jenkinson (1982) because I counted them myself! Should I have quoted Plate Nos as "loc=Plate xxx"? But that leaves the info taken from the first 4 pages; how should their location within the book be identified? Hoots Mon (talk) 13:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Citation for Brighton Toy Museum

I have always been wary of this citation as it is little short of hearsay. Should it be deleted?Hoots Mon (talk) 13:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Mistake in table of locomotives

I have had to correct an item in the Table of Locomotives regarding No 46251. The date of receiving its smoke deflectors was Aug 1948, yet in Accidents and Incidents there is a photo in Apr 1948 showing its damaged smoke deflector. What is the source for this table so it can be checked? Hoots Mon (talk) 13:02, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

The Book of Coronation Pacifics Mk2

i have come into the possession of the above book. It is an updated edition of the excellent original by Sixsmith and the author, Baker, has conducted his own researches to write Mk2. I believe that dates given in this book are well researched and that unless challenged specifically by another author (of which there is one instance), dates given in this volume should be definitive. The issue most at odds with many of the dates in the article so far are dates of receiving new smokeboxes. I shall first test Baker's dates by studying photographs at given dates. Hoots Mon (talk) 14:11, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Good Article?

I'd like to nominate this article for Good Article status. Comments please! Hoots Mon (talk) 18:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Black tint to blue in contents

I'm puzzled by this edit summary. You didn't alter a tint - you made a spelling correction. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

I could have sworn that the correction triggered a change in the font colour. The fact that it stood out as being black in the contents box is what led me to notice the spelling mistake. But I can't replicate it I must admit. Hoots Mon (talk) 14:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

More black

Hi, regarding images like this and the others at LMS Coronation Class#Table of BR liveries - a JPEG file isn't a very good way for depicting unbroken solid areas of colour. A PNG file is somewhat better, but personally I would create a SVG file. Here's that same black rectangle as SVG:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!-- Created by Redrose64 for Wikipedia -->
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1" width="75" height="117">
  <title>LMS plain black livery</title>
  <rect width="75" height="117" fill="black" stroke="none" />
</svg>

It's much smaller in terms of disc space used, and is infinitely scalable without loss. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll give it a try. I've been looking at SVG code and it seems pretty straightforward with regard to defining coordinates and defining colours in hex. Seems fun! Hoots Mon (talk) 22:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

I use the set of docs that start at Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.1 (Second Edition) W3C Recommendation 16 August 2011. There are over forty web pages linked from that: a lot of them aren't of much interest, but the ones that I find most useful are: Document Structure; Styling; Coordinate Systems, Transformations and Units; Paths; Basic Shapes; Text; Painting: Filling, Stroking and Marker Symbols; Color; and Gradients and Patterns. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

I think that using this image for nos. 6230-4 is misleading. AFAIK these used the standard lining of black and yellow. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks! That had completel passed me by. Now sorted! Hoots Mon (talk) 19:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Map pigmentation in Europe.svg

The file File:Map pigmentation in Europe.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Identical duplicate of File:Map pigmentation in Europe.png, except with the raster image being wrapped inside and SVG file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Quibik (talk) 13:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of LMS Coronation Class

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article LMS Coronation Class you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bob1960evens -- Bob1960evens (talk) 22:40, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of LMS Coronation Class

The article LMS Coronation Class you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:LMS Coronation Class for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bob1960evens -- Bob1960evens (talk) 21:40, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of LMS Coronation Class

The article LMS Coronation Class you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:LMS Coronation Class for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bob1960evens -- Bob1960evens (talk) 13:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hoots Mon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hoots Mon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:BR lined green livery.jpg

The file File:BR lined green livery.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:BR lined black livery.jpg

The file File:BR lined black livery.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:BR experimental blue livery.jpg

The file File:BR experimental blue livery.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:BR standard blue livery.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:BR lined maroon livery.jpg

The file File:BR lined maroon livery.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:LMS lined maroon livery.jpg

The file File:LMS lined maroon livery.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:LMS plain black livery.jpg

The file File:LMS plain black livery.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:LMS lined black livery.jpg

The file File:LMS lined black livery.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:LMS lined black livery 1946-.jpg

The file File:LMS lined black livery 1946-.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)