Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw how you edited or created The Hipsters, and I noticed that the username you have chosen, "HipsterBoys", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or have the appearance of shared use. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. --Drm310 (talk) 06:19, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

No no, I'm only editing on behalf of myself, not a member of a company or organisation of the sort. The username HipsterBoys I choose as it just so happens that "The Hipsters" is a favourite song of mine, that's all. HipsterBoys (talk) 13:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit
Hello, HipsterBoys! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Road Wizard (talk) 19:20, 20 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HipsterBoys (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have never had any sort of connection with the user you stated above. Previously, in the past, I had been a sockpupet but not of the above user, and my apology was accepted a few months ago and now I believe I am entitled to edit. As I Said, I have had no connection with the edits to the above and this will be made clear with my contributions.....

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sockpuppet account. Likewise, as this account is only about one month old, I fail to see how "my apology was accepted a few months ago" makes any sense. Kinu t/c 18:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.