Hiepoonam

Speedy deletion nomination of International Fighting Spirit Week & International High Spirit Day

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Fighting Spirit Week & International High Spirit Day, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - MrX 13:19, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Doctor's Pulse

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Doctor's Pulse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Peridon (talk) 14:09, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello, Hiepoonam! I saw your posts at User:Peridon's talk page and I want to welcome you to Wikipedia. It looks as if your initial attempts here were not acceptable for Wikipedia, because the cause you want to promote is not notable as Wikipedia defines it - that is, there has not been significant coverage about it from other sources. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, so it can't be the FIRST place where something is publicized; Wikipedia only reports what other reliable sources have said about the subject. There are plenty of places where you can promote awareness of your cause, but Wikipedia is not one of them. As far as this event goes, I couldn't even find a web page for it, and that would seem to be a necessary starting point. I'd also suggest you create a Facebook page and use other free social media to spread the word. (That won't help you get an article here, but it will give you a place where you can talk about your cause without somebody deleting it.)

Meanwhile, I encourage you to find other ways to help Wikipedia; usually it's best to start by making small edits to existing articles rather than by creating new articles, as you have found out.

The other reason I am posting to you here is to suggest that your angry, accusatory tone at Peridon's talk page is not going to help your cause. We are all supposed try to be civil to each other, even when the others are saying or doing things that we don't like. I'd suggest that you modify your tone, and stop accusing people of bias and ego, and it will get you a lot further here. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 16:27, 20 July 2013 (UTC) (another talk page stalker)

Thanks Melanie for your explanation. I appreciate it.

I am surprised you didn't find cause when it's been on fb for a few days. But still Thanks for suggesting fb.

As for my tone you might have noted it was polite until I noticed people to be biased and egoistic. My dear if I see that I will speak so. Just like them I have rights too. No one in this world can stop me from speaking my mind. I am not a doormat and people can't just walk over me. I will not tolerate biased behaviour. Be nice to me and I'll be very good, be bad to me and I can be worse

I know where I have to go and I will reach there. Still once again thanks for your advice

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.32.127.152 (talk) 03:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Now that you say that, I do find a Facebook page under that title. However, it doesn't contain any information that I can see. That might be a good next project for you - to fill out that Facebook page with the information about what this Week is about, when it is, how to observe it, etc. I'll look forward to seeing more at that site, since I can't read the deleted article (only administrators can read deleted articles). Good luck with it! --MelanieN (talk) 17:23, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Peridon. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 06:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Ah... finally the threat. ... I was wondering why didn't it happen until now. ....Bonadea the stalker...... do you think I am scared of blocking?

Does it seem to you that it matters to me?

Please don't THREATEN me and stop messing in other people's affairs. I am sure Peridon knows how to defend himself. You don't have to be his caretaker, especially when you know nothing

Finally

I CAN'T CARE LESS ABOUT BEING BLOCKED. So please go away. Hope this is decent enough for youHiepoonam (talk) 07:31, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Not a threat, simply information about what happens to those who use abusive languages against other editors. It's not as if it is a terrible punishment to be blocked from Wikipedia - it's only a website - but it would be unfair not to let you know what the results of your actions would be if you were to continue them. I'm sorry that your experiences of Wikipedia have been so unpleasant for you, and I very much hope that you find a more suitable venue to let people know about your cause. Wishing you the best of luck, --bonadea contributions talk 08:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Dear Bonadea... Thanks for your kind advice. ... now once again I say. ... go away. ..leave me alone. ..I have had enough of unfair treatment and it doesnt matter to me anymore .since you have been decent in this message. .I don't wish to loose my cool. . So thanks again and goodbyeHiepoonam (talk) 10:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not exist to promote your cause (or mine), however noble we perceive them to be. It is a venue for impartial articles about topics which have already become notable; nothing more. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)