Hernandp19
What a timely issue! Providing information about this DACA litigation will be a great resource. Because it’s such a recent issue, there may not be a ton of law reviews discussing the case. You may look at legal blogs or online law reviews, which are more timely publication sources. You could also consider situating this case within the broader framework of DACA/DAPA litigation. Slsnw12 (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Welcome
editHello, Hernandp19 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.
Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
| This user is a student editor in Stanford_Law_School/Advanced_Legal_Research_(Winter_2019) . |
Welcome!
editHello, Hernandp19, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Kwan's Peer Review 1
edit@Hernandp19, great job creating an article that provides such timely and helpful information! I was surprised there wasn't already an existing article on such an important topic. You did a great job presenting an arguably controversial topic in a neutral and objective manner and cited reliable sources where necessary. The section headers are also great signposts, as they are clear and informative. I also found the hyperlinks in the "Decision" section to be really helpful.
A couple points of constructive feedback you might consider:
1) It might be helpful to the reader, especially he/she who lacks familiarity with the topic, if you provided hyperlinks in the intro paragraph. For example, you could provide the hyperlink for DACA (in fact, it might even be worth it to spell it out the first time) in the intro paragraph, and maybe even the APA.
2) You might consider mentioning at the end of the intro paragraph that the case has been appealed (I know you mention it later, but doing it here might be informative!).
3) I may be wrong, but it appears that certain cases at the district court are missing some information (e.g., the year that the district court ruled on the Regents of the Univ. of Cal. case). If I'm incorrect, please disregard this comment.
4) You might consider either moving the DAPA hyperlink to where it first comes up (in the "Filing the Case" section) or adding it there as well.
5) Lastly, if the case opinion is available on Westlaw or Lexis, providing pincites might be helpful to the reader.
Overall great job again! I really enjoyed reading and reviewing your article, and learned a ton in the process, so thank you! KKim2019 (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for your informative new article on Batalla Vidal v. Nielsen.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.