User talk:HereToHelp/Archive1

Please see User talk:HereToHelp for new disscussions.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Shimgray 21:21, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

• I brought this back from the netherworld of deleted pages having gotten rid of it before I knew not to. HereToHelp (talk)

iMac

Thanks for the comments, they were pretty useful. However it was User:Tony1 who was really doing up the page, so I transferred the comments from my page to his. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:16, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia

You're right to point out that Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. I don't really see that in conflict with the idea that it would be nice to create paper or DVD editions, based on the content in the wiki. That's part of the reason the wiki has a free license. Just because the amount of space in a DVD or paper distribution is limited, doesn't mean we have to go back and make the entire wiki fit into that space. The idea is to just take the best parts, knowing that more content will be available for those with Internet access. -- Beland 04:54, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

• I can see your point, but I still uphold that an archival version of Wikipedia is an oxymoron. HereToHelp 20:14, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Username/Wikipedia's downfall/Community portal redesign

The following is archived from both of our user talk pages into the entire disccussion.HereToHelp

I wanted to tell you this before, but... You have got a very cool username :) Renata3 19:32, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

• Um...okay...thanks. You see, usernames here are divided into two catagories: Those based on names and those that are not. This is an extention of whether or not you trust personal data on Wikipedia. Currently, I choose not to divulge my personal info; but at a later date, I may. HereToHelp 16:50, 15 October 2005 (UTC) PS: why is my response longer than your message?
• I agree entirely on what you are saying [in response to What will kill Wikipedia on Renata's page]. The vandals always make big edits people know not to trust and are reverted quickly. Accuracy is no problem in long, looked-at articles (stubs are a different matter). But server size and lack of volunteers is a major threat.

Unfortunatly life indeed does love irony; and there's only so much server room. Which means I can't say with any certainty that your prediction is wrong (I hope it is). But...it's going to take a long time before we get to that point, and everyone is happy to help and prevent this. Right? Right? HereToHelp 01:41, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Funny :) I understand why you don't put your info on wiki - it's undeletable. I am glad to see you so enthusiastic about community portal redisign. Could you be bold and just do it? (ie split up the pages into 2 pages). And for killing wiki... ach, I just hope I am wrong. But it's so great, and yet so fragile... Going to sleep. Renata3 03:00, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

• I guess I could split the Community portal up, but I think we should give people time to eliminate all possible opposition before doing something and come up with names for the two new portals. I like Help portal, but To-do portal? Maybe Open tasks portal, or something someone else might suugest. Give it time, I think it will come out well. As for What will kill Wikipedia, just hope we're wrong. I'm going to copy this over to your userpage so you see it (you'd think we'd figure out how to have it all in one place, you know?). Regards, HereToHelp 18:47, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

I say - split it up, make a rough draft and then give people time to brainstorm about it, decide the name, exact layout, content, and all other small & boring details. I mean we cannot really move forward with the redesign if we don't have those drafts because people actually need to see what we are talking about. Renata3 22:06, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

• I'm going to have to archive this disscussion in its entirety later...sigh.[this has now been taken care of] Sure, I'll draft the Help portal , because I'm sure of it's name, but later. HereToHelp 23:03, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Jacksonville, Florida

No problem Thanks for the comment!. I'm working on city/town pages that are lacking maps and inserting them as many as possible. This may look different from the previous version, in which I don't know why it was deleted from the page in the first place, anyhoo, Unlike that last map, this one shows the exact boundaries of the city and it's suburban communities. I'll try my best to improve this article as much as I can!! --Moreau36; 1434, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment too! --Revolución (talk) 00:01, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Lukcy.

You lucky fool. I was so trying to be the person to fix the main page, but I kept getting session lost messages. Arrgh! Hipocrite - «Talk» 22:43, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

MainPage

Background: around 23:04, 1 November 2005 (UTC), the main page was vandalized under the guise of moving it to a bogus page with a redirect, or at least that's how it appeared to me, who took immediate though admittedly not the final course of action to fix it. HereToHelp (talk)

THANK YOU! --WAvegetarian 22:43, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

On the contrary, undoing article moves should be done only by administrative action, and copying and pasting content does not replace lost history archives. — flamingspinach | (talk) 22:44, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

The main page is a very very very special case. The article can be moved back after the copy-paste, I would argue, and in this case, was. Hipocrite - «Talk» 22:50, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

• The point WAS NOT a permenant fix. When a sysop moves it, great, it should be done. In the mean time I had a hard time believing the move should have been done:

1. There was no tag or boilerplate text indicating the move, before or after, like the Community portal and
2. If it did need to be moved for some reason, move it to Main Page (archive) or something, not the crazy location our welcome mat was at.

I really just was in the right place at the right time to fix it. Get it back to normal, do a better job, sure...my objective was to fix it ASAP. HereToHelp (talk) 23:01, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Modest Mouse

There are 4 band members currently. But on the albums the music is layered, using many istruments, so on stage, there are more than 4 people playing instruments. (unsigned by Mainxzibit6789)

Thanks...but normally you'll want to put answeres to talk page questions on that talk page. You don't see me going to your talk page...gee, I wonder why...HereToHelp|talk 22:46, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Your extension to "Template:Jews and Judaism sidebar"

Gosh! You're brave!

Generally, I think that at least some of the additional links will be very helpful to many people. For my penn'orth I'll make the following specific observations.

• The heading "Significant observances" is in the wrong colour (because it's not a link).
• You could keep the template shorter by rearanging the links, so that you get more links on some lines. It's a lengthy template and any economy of length will help.
• In all other sections, the first line is on a pale blue ground. You've started the new section with a white ground, so it looks odd.
• The raised full point, set with "& n b s p ; & # 1 8 3 ;", needs a word space after it, but not before.

In any event, these are my personal observations and may not reflect a consensus of opinion.

Thanks for inviting discussion. BrownBean 23:35, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

• That was the point: to invite discussion. I'll take the tips into mind. I don't consider myself "brave", rather, I simply was be bold|bold. HereToHelp (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

I see that someone else promptly rearranged the template, making reference to some evident rules I can't find. I've put a request on the template discussion page. BrownBean 01:11, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

• Oh, boy--I just finished uploading a revised version right before this got to me! To the talk page! HereToHelp (talk) 01:18, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

It's only my opinion, mind you, but I reckon you've turned the template into something of enduring value to everyone. BrownBean 02:41, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

HeretoHelp and Brown Bean. I think that your additions were valuable, but from my experience on Wikipedia, templates are best kept with a narrow mandate or everyone expands them. The original Jew template was designed for the "Jew" article, to complement the sections of that article, and a seperate Judaism template was being designed. I worry that if we start expanding the Judaism template, we will soon see everyone adding specific elements of Jewish practice, and the template will grow out of control. Take a look at Template:Israelis. --Goodoldpolonius2 04:17, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

I feel that the current version is a significant improvement on what I've seen the past couple of months. If it lasts then I'd say that it was worth the effort. BrownBean 20:00, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

I feel the same way. All in all, great job to us both. --HereToHelp (talk) 20:04, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Death Star

TNEC stands for The New Essential Chronology, a fantastic piece of literature that summarizes all major and most minor events from both the Star Wars Expanded Universe and the movies. It is this source which confirms that the Death Star seen in Revenge of the Sith is the same Death Star seen in A New Hope. A prototype was created, but not until after construction had already begun on the Death Star from the films; this was done in order to test the viability of the station's superlaser. Jon Hart 23:34, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

• Thanks for responding to my request for info. --HereToHelp (talk) 00:28, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Yes, Vader's Quest is canon. LFL has a strict policy toward maintaining the integrity of Star Wars continuity, so the line between what is canon and what is apocryphal, or "Infinities," is usually pretty clear.

• All Devilworlds comics
• All Infinities comics
• All Tag and Bink comics
• Star Wars Tales #1-20 and specifically marked stories from #21-24
• Sergio Aragones Stomps Star Wars
• As a general rule, the "dark side" alternate ending of all video games
• Any unlikely aspect of video games that can be chalked up to "gameplay mechanics," such as it taking multiple hits from a lightsaber to kill an unarmored enemy
• Unreconcilable discrepancies between the movies and their various adaptations, such as differences in dialogue and Episode IV's squadron names
• Editing errors, like typos and reversed film frames
• Any source that has been retroactively dubbed apocryphal by LFL

Note, too, that just because a certain story is Infinities, not every aspect of it is necessarily apocryphal. Darth Vader killing the Dark Woman, for instance, "really" happened in Star Wars continuity, but the precise manner in which their battle occurred has yet to be confirmed.

Vader pretending not to know Luke, however, was added to Empire in the DVD release. Since the opening crawl and Vader's line "And I'm sure Skywalker is with them" make it clear that Vader did, in fact, know about Luke, the film's implication is that Palpatine and Vader were playing another of their mind games in their conversation. Jon Hart 18:23, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

• Ummm....yeah.....thanks....--HereToHelp (talk) 18:25, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
  • You must excuse my fellow fanboy. He forgets that he is in the presence of a non fanboy. :P The Wookieepedian 03:22, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

De Lorean DMC-12

Please see Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/De Lorean DMC-12/archive1 and consider voting support based on my reply to your objection. Thanks, and great work on the Apple Macintosh article! — Wackymacs 19:00, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Fixed Dinosaur

I've managed to acomplish some of your tasks you set for the Dinosaur FAC. I've also left some notes on what I think needs clarifying. Please respond on the Dinosaur subpage.... Spawn Man 02:11, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

By captions, you mean the picture captions, am I right? If so, I do not know how I could possibly add dates to them... Spawn Man 23:07, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Periods? Example? eg, 19th Century. Ming period? Spawn Man 23:28, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

I have completed your bidding, all your objections have been fixed. I would like to see your vote change, but it's up to you... Spawn Man 00:06, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

What will it take to get your vote to strong support? Spawn Man 01:06, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Dunno. The little intangible aspecs...come on; it's a support—and the article's doing well. --HereToHelp (talk) 01:07, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

question, do you think that you could check on what I'm doing? I've been citing pieces of the article from books, but I am unsure I am doing it correctly. Could you check? Please? You seem intelligent & competent... Spawn Man 01:13, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject Macintosh

I have started a WikiProject that aims to improve all Apple Macintosh related articles to featured article standard. The project is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Macintosh, I hope you are interested in becoming a participant in the project to improve hundreds of articles in a group of valuable Wikipedians. Thanks! — Wackymacs 12:01, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

• Sounds interesting. I'll check it out—thanks. --HereToHelp (talk) 13:34, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Update: I am now a major member of the Wikiproject, and have taken it upon myself to welcome everyone who joins. So, for archival purposes:

==[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Macintosh|WikiProject Macintosh]]== Thanks for joining! Our current focus is [[Apple Computer]]. Our former focus and current [[WP:FAC|]] is [[Apple Macintosh]]; you can vote [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Apple Macintosh|here]]. Don't forget to put {{tl|Project Macintosh}} and {{tl|user WikiProject Macintosh}} on your userpage! We’re all honored that you want to join our WikiProject. --~~~~

--HereToHelp (talk) 01:08, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

uhhh... whats with the current focus and fac articles being the same? any reason why the capitalization is off as well? Thanks for the welcome tho. I still have one final left before break so I'm not going to be able to spend any significant amount of time helping just yet... Paul^C/_T+ 18:27, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

• Sorry about that.--HereToHelp (talk) 22:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

---

Listen,

I'd like to give you some advice about WikiProject Macintosh. Calm down a little bit. Don't take responsibility for all the work. I may be new to Wikipedia, but I work collaboratively a lot in my life, and I know how hard it is to feel like you are the only one taking any responsibility. However, if you make comments that alienate, or even condemn, other members of a team... Well then you are just asking for all the work to rest on your shoulders. Wackymacs, and I are trying our best to put as much time in on this project as possible, and I'm sure that at least some of the other project members are doing the same.

The work you have done thus far on WikiProject Macintosh is exemplary, and I know that it is frustrating that we haven't gotten one article featured yet. But, give it some time... more importantly give the team-members some time, and we will create one hell-of-a-WikiProject.

Thanks for working so hard. If no one else appreciates it, I do.

—t-bte288-c 19:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

You're right, and I'm sorry. I did overreact, and I apologize. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. --HereToHelp (talk) 19:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Listen. I appreciate that you are trying to help out, but on the Apple Macintosh page, you are out of control. I'm not a mod, but this is really quite distressing. Do you have any idea how hard two dozen edits in a row makes things for other editors? It makes it impossible to work around any mistakes you, or anyone else may make. You have GOT To stop this. PLEASE condense what you are doing into a few edits. 9/10 of your posts are tiny edits, and the other 1/10 are huge sweeping changes. Also, you seem to be putting in your own point of view, which is not allowed on Wikipedia.

I'm not trying to attack you, I'm just very frustrated. I do think you have a lot to contribute- I can see from some of your posts that you are adding valuable information, but it is, as I see it, also mixed in with not-so-valuable information. I'm not saying you're the only one, heck, I'm certainly guilty of that.. mostly everyone is from time to time. But you simply have got to stop these dozens of edits in a row. There is no need for it, and it gums up the works. Please consider all editing possibilities before you make one, AND USE THE PREVIEW BUTTON before hitting the "Save" button. I find myself hitting the preview button three, four even five times before I will save my own edits. It is a powerful tool, use it.

I reverted a bunch of your edits, because I simply don't have time to weed out what was useful and what wasn't (and believe me when I say, I saw some of both).

Again, I have nothing against you, and appreciate what you're trying to do, but please try to be more concise. Angelic Wraith.

P.S. I assume it is all right to post here- I'm honestly not sure how to send messages, if that is at all possible. If there is some way to do this without modifying user discussion pages, please let me know. I'm not trying to vandalize your page, just get a point across.

No, it's fine. What sort of block of edits do you mean? Way back (about a week ago) in Apple macintosh? A lot of those were some good changes! Do you mean the section on major litigation? The internet is very slow this time of year—see the notice on the top of this page—so I'm forced to make my edits slowly because half the time it doesn't load for me to save. But, alright, I'll use the preview more, I already use it alot. And I'm familiar with WP:NPOV. But, thanks for the comments, and I'll keep them in mind.

You helped choose {{subst:IDRIVEtopic article}} as this week's WP:ACID winner

Apple Macintosh FAC

Hey, It doesn't seem to be going as well as I planned. We've done all this work, and a few people are still nitpicking. There are three opposes because of the length of the article, what should we do? See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Apple Macintosh for those people's comments and my replies. — Wackymacs 20:15, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Don't worry, we just got two supports. We're winning. --HereToHelp (talk) 21:53, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Hey there, just got your invite. Outside of maybe minor edits, I don't know how much I'd be able to contribute to the project, but since it involves Macs I'd be very happy to come aboard. What would I have to do to join? --Cjmarsicano 22:13, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

It looks like you have already figured that out.--HereToHelp (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Al Gore?

Question, why did you tag Al Gore as being part of the Mac project? 68.39.174.238 19:20, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• It says in the lead that he sits on the Apple board of directors--HereToHelp (talk) 19:24, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Good work - Barnstar for you

This barnstar is awarded to you for your work on Apple Macintosh and your efforts to improve many other articles. Well done! Wackymacs 22:09, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Steve Jobs

Hi. Before adding a request to Wikipedia:Requested pictures, you could at least check the foreign language links. They would have given you for example commons:Steve_Jobs (or http://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%ACnh:SteveJobs.jpeg with a copyright I cannot read). Could you add an image you like to Steve Jobs and remove the request from Wikipedia:Requested pictures? thanks -- Chris 73 | Talk 08:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

My request stands. All of those images, though useful and potentialy addable to the article, are not direct headshots that are needed for the lead and infobox. We need something that will show the reader what the subject's face looks like. The image should be exclusive of any other items, such as Apple products. I contemplated cropping one of the images you linked to, but the subject is not facing directly towards the camera like he is in the one we have. Besides, such cropping would cause a low resolution (that's probably how we got the image we have now). We need a fresh image that shows Jobs without anything else. I. e., what we had before, just with a better rez and no copyright violations.

I went looking online, and found a couple of CC pics, and added them to commons:Steve_Jobs. Unfortunately, their resolution is not great, but surely good enough for within an article (e.g. Image:Steve Jobs at Stanford.jpg. Maybe you can use one of those? -- Chris 73 | Talk 00:57, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!

MERRY CHRISTMAS, HereToHelp/Archive1! and a happy New Year too! — Wackymacs 15:43, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Uh...thanks...how about Hanukkah?

I appreciate your thoughtfulness, though.--HereToHelp (talk) 17:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Transparency

Hello. You asked at the Democrat template about how I make things transparent. What I do is open Microsoft Paint and I draw in the photo/icon, then I put a background color. I pick a color that is not used in the drawing, so things will not be ruined later on. I save the image as a bitmap file, and I open it in GIMP. Once open, I choose layer, then transparency, and select the option "Color to Alpha." I chose that, then I go to select color. I select the background color and I cut it away from the photo. This will give your background a checkered pattern, which shows it is transparent. Save it as a PNG or GIF image and you are done.

About the template itself, all I ask for is that if an icon is chosen, I just wish it could be under a free license. If a donkey is not possible, then we could just use the US-D thing I did earlier or just use the US flag. I hope this is not too demanding, but I would like to help all parties solve this problem. Zach ^{(Smack Back)} 01:32, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I'll try that out.--HereToHelp (talk) 02:40, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Re: Template:User democrat

I know [1]. I apologize for forgetting to reply about this. Also I was hoping the edit war had actually stopped. I'm not going to involve myself with this template any further. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 13:28, Dec. 27, 2005

I don't blame you. It's been a mess.--HereToHelp (talk) 13:30, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Nothing personal, but i'm not going to stop with the logo there, especially after this[2] tactic by Carnildo on WP:FUC. karmafist 20:13, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!!!

Thanks for the medal, I wasn't expecting that. :) I thought you wouldn't mind me 'borrowing' your navigation box for my userpage. I'm just about to change my userpage a bit actually, watch out for the changes (as if you care :P). P.S: How do you think the Apple Computer article is going in terms of getting it to featured status? — Wackymacs 20:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Apple Macintosh was shameful when I started working on it - take a look at this revision before my first edit on the article - the WP:AID and yourself improved it a lot. P.S my newer userpage is saved now. — Wackymacs 20:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

I really like the Aqua on the portal though - is there a way to change the edit links to white? — Wackymacs 20:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm going to keep it as Aqua, nobody is editing the portal anyway, and the edit links are visible (yes I know not very visible but you can see them). — Wackymacs 14:34, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Hey, I got an idea! Why don't we move the edit links out of the title bars into the main box sections? Portal:War uses this technique. — Wackymacs 20:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

It's that kind of thinking that separates us from the Neanderthals.--HereToHelp (talk) 20:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

WP:FAIR

Hello. Just a quick reminder per WP:FAIR Fair Use images can not be used inline on user pages. --Romeo Bravo 02:39, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

What do you mean? The links bar on top of the page? The userboxes? Please specify.--HereToHelp (talk) 02:51, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Your icons on your links bar. the userboxes need to be addressed on each template's talk page. --Romeo Bravo 04:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

I could just as easily get you for advertising Rogers AT&T.--HereToHelp (talk) 04:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

True, though Rogers AT&T is no more, its just Rogers Wireless now. --Romeo Bravo 04:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Same difference.--HereToHelp (talk) 13:50, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

WP:FAIR is not actually a policy, so we cannot be forced to remove fair use images from our user pages. — Wackymacs 21:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

True. It's not as binding as, say, NPOV--HereToHelp (talk) 21:19, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

attack template

I have deleted the template you created as an attack page. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 23:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

You are welcome to recreate it as long as it does not blatantly attack other users. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 23:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Then you'll let this template stand.--HereToHelp (talk) 23:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Fair use images and templates

I know that you are upset about what is going on with the icons. Other users are not happy about it either, but I wish for you and others to just do me a favor and relax. I agree, what has been going on has been swift with little to no prior debate. But, the amount of templates that use FU icons are very small, and most can have icons that are freely licensed (GNU, CC, PD) and be used in the templates. Some might not be able to, and some will we have to design our own. But, I ask you and others to stay calm and we can work something out. Zach ^{(Smack Back)} 04:11, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

You're right. I think we all bent the rules and got angrier than we should. But if we can civily debate the issue, and have a deadline for when these images have to be out of community pages, I'll like it a lot better.--HereToHelp (talk) 13:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

I do not think there is a dead-line persay for these templates having copyright OK images. Most of the templates have copyright OK images, or do not use images at all. Very, very few had to be changed with a discussion, and only one I ran into resulted in people filing an RFC over. For other images, all I had to do was head over to the Wikimedia Commons and find some photos there. I found photos of the Xbox 360 there, crowns, drag queens (don't ask) and if Hedley was sticking around, I had a Sealand flag he could have used for that Sealand template of his. Plus, I think what bothered you a lot is people coming to your talk page and user page and changed the icons on your user page, not via a template, but your pages directly, which I believe that was wrong too. But I thank you for staying calm with me, but I do not really think there will be a deadline for the userbox images since I am seeing many user boxes will probably wind up on TFD soon. Zach ^{(Smack Back)} 20:10, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, blatant stuff like that I protest. I'll check out the commons. Thanks.--HereToHelp (talk) 21:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

HAPPY NEW YEAR

Happy New Year HTH!!! I wish you happy editing for the new year! Thank you for informing me on the Wikiproject! -- Mac Davis ญƛ. 10:54, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Is it okay to delete Image:Mozilla Firefox logo navy.png?

It's no longer in use. Correct? —David Levy 02:54, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Sure. I can always recreate it if need be. We're going to be making a bunch of these until we can decide on which one to use; go ahead and get rid of that one.--HereToHelp (talk) 03:26, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Stub image on {{mac-stub}}

Hello there. May I ask why you keep adding a fair use image (Image:Apple-logo.png) to the above template when a perfectly good free image (Image:Crystal mac.png) exists? --TheParanoidOne 17:12, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Alright, I confess. Fine.--HereToHelp (talk) 19:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Hmm. That's a confusing response, which doesn't really address the question at all. I would like to change it back to the free version. Do you intend to revert it again to the fair use image? --TheParanoidOne 20:03, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

No, I won't. The fair use one is used a lot of other places where it probably shouldn't be, but I won't revert you.--HereToHelp (talk) 20:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. --TheParanoidOne 16:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Apple Macintosh Contribution Statistics

Thought you might be interested in this http://tools.wikimedia.de/~tim/counter/?page=Apple+Macintosh TDS ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:27, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! Now whether to brag or be concerned...--HereToHelp (talk) 00:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

You really like transparency, don't you?

A present for you: Image:Macintosh 128k transparency.png. It actually looks nice enough on the templates to consider keeping it. -- grm_wnr Esc 22:03, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

I confess, you got me there.--HereToHelp (talk) 22:56, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

re:your image bar

First of all, I'm not singling you out, I just have that page on my watchlist so I can tell every time you revert it. Secondly, just because everyone else is doing it is a crappy reason for doing anything especially when they're doing something that makes no sense and is blatantly against laws and guidelines. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 22:19, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

How is it now?--HereToHelp (talk) 23:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

It's great. Thanks for being receptive (eventually) to changing it and I think it's a very good user bar now. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 23:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Yeah. What would we do without that set of icons; I've seen them used alot. How and why are they all GNU?--HereToHelp (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Vote for deletion

You may be interested in this vote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/A_wife_confused_for_a_sister. Yoninah 22:33, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, 5 macs.

> and that you have 5 Macs to contribute with!

Yeah. The screenshot of Mac OS X Server 1.0 is mine. I'm also responsible for adding a "few" more backronyms for XP.—Preceding unsigned comment added by T3h (talk • contribs)

Links

I took the liberty to copy your Links section, I mean the top bar. I hope you don't mind, it is merely a sign of my appreciation. Federico Pistono 17:22, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Not at all. I'm honored, and it's not the first time some user has copied me. That other user will remain anonomous to protect their version of the bar which uses fair use images (mine did, too, but I've switched to these GNU icons). Speaking of copyright, technically you can't have the wikipedia/media logos on your page. Technically.--HereToHelp (talk) 20:07, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

a winner is you

Since I hate to leave a perfectly fine picture just lying around, and also because I think your barnstar is getting a bit lonely, I have decided to be creative. And so, without much further ado:

		An Award
		For his tireless work on the Macintosh WikiProject, and especially his deciding role in getting Apple Macintosh to featured article standard, I, grm_wnr, hereby award HereToHelp the first Apple With A Bite Taken Out Of It, which shall henceforth be presented to individuals who contribute greatly to Apple- and Macintosh-related articles.

-- grm_wnr Esc 01:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

When I came here, the apple was already bitten :) Hey, thanks for fixing my hm pg. ←Humus sapiens←ну? 01:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Help:Contents

Thanks for the words of encouragement. By the way, the link you posted me on your idea didn't work (the link, not the idea), and I'm interested in checking it out (the idea - I wasn't quite sure what you were referring to). Your feedback was uplifting, and I'm glad you like the graphics. There are however a couple people who are dead set upon removing the graphics. I've got to go to the page now to restore those. If you would post your feedback on Help talk:Contents, that would sure help. --Go for it! 06:42, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Rocketship

If you think it will work, try it! There's a drawing of the shuttle on the image page for that picture. I tried to use it as an icon, but it wouldn't shrink down to 30px. --Go for it! 20:17, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

I'll try this image.--HereToHelp (talk) 20:38, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Main Page Redesign Draft 5 Now Open For Editing In Preparation Of Draft 6

Hi. You posted some good suggestions in the latest round of discussions, and you mentioned that you would love to implement them. The draft has been made open for editing until Saturday (see the discussion page there). So, if you wouldn't mind, I'd love to see what you can do! --Go for it! 02:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

I was just about to do that when an orange bar appeared on my screen.--:HereToHelp (talk • contribs) 02:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

I award this Barnstar to HereToHelp for their great efforts in making Wikipedia a better place. The Neokid Talk