HedgeW

HedgeW, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi HedgeW! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at French Bulldog. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

You've made a tiny number of edits and the vast majority appear to be simply undoing other people's work. Just now you put back an egregious copyright violation that I had removed. You didn't bother to leave an edit summary. So, what was your reason? 51.7.17.231 (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

• IP, thanks for noticing that--but man, it sucked that I had to run into it; it took me over a quarter of an hour to scrub the history. Drmies (talk) 01:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
• Listen, all their other edits I've seen were fine, EXCEPT for the lack of explanation. HedgeW, two things. First of all, look carefully before you revert. I suspect you may have looked at it again and decided you were wrong. Second, leave edit summaries. Unexplained reverts are disruptive unless it's obvious vandalism, and this clearly wasn't. Your efforts are appreciated, of course. Drmies (talk) 01:11, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
• I've had a chance to look back over this edit, and I agree with both above, I acted too quickly on the revert. I wasn't doing so in bad faith, apologies both. HedgeW (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2019 (UTC)