Re: welcome and edit summary

Hi Xiner,

thanks for the warm welcome and for helping me. I will look after the edit summary thing as you adviced.

Harisnya 23:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

Hello, Harisnya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Xiner (talk, email) 22:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removing AfDs

edit

Please stop repeatedly removing the Articles for Deletion notice from the Pantyhose for men article until the issue is settled; it is considered avoidant vandalism. You are welcome to argue your case on the relevant AfD debate page, however the deletion notice must remain until the debate is settled. — Krimpet (talk/review) 13:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

re: Removing AfDs

edit

Please stop vandalising the Pantyhose for men article. You are actually reverting it to a vandalised version each time. Please read and follow the steps described as "Before nominating an AfD" on the Articles for Deletion page as there are many more do before simply merging it to another article without any discussion.

You are still warmly welcome to discuss or improve the article - but it hasn't happened at all.

Also check Wikipedia deletion policy explains valid grounds for deletion and the usual process.

Harisnya 23:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am not "vandalizing" the article; I am reinstating the AfD tag as it is required to remain on the page at all times while the discussion is taking place. As for why I believe it should be deleted, please read WP:POVFORK; I believe this article is such a fork, as there is no need for a whole other article on pantyhose for men when we can simply mention succinctly in Pantyhose that a market for male pantyhose has been founded in recent years. I believe you are acting in good faith, but I am going to give you one more warning: do not remove the AfD tag from this article again, as it is considered avoidant vandalism. If you remove the AfD tag a third time, I am going to request administrator intervention.Krimpet (talk/review) 00:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pantyhose for men for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pantyhose for men is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pantyhose for men (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Mississippi 16:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply