Even if you have the rights to do so please do not mess with my editing assume I know what I am doing, I will try and fix anything I have previously altered that appears wrong just point it out if you see anything out of place and add the subject to the discussion of the related page. Thanks in advance.

February 2017

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Seyit Çabuk. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, HardMental. You have new messages at Mz7's talk page.
Message added 03:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Mz7 (talk) 03:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:HardMental reported by User:Chris troutman (Result: ). Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines you need to pay attention to

edit

The following are social contracts that members of the site have (directly or indirectly) agreed to prevent larger problems:

Note: The above points are why I'm almost ready to block you. I will be monitoring further actions by you and will second a block carried out by other admins even if I have not yet pulled the trigger myself.

Ian.thomson (talk) 08:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, HardMental. You have new messages at Ian.thomson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-

Seyit as a nominee & A background story of the shot listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Seyit as a nominee & A background story of the shot. Since you had some involvement with the Seyit as a nominee & A background story of the shot redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Train2104 (t • c) 04:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Reply