September 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sayyid has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sayyid may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {| class="wikitable"

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:24, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Gzsk101, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Gzsk101! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:26, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2014

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sayyid. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 18:59, 24 September 2014 (UTC) I'm adding content why do you keep removing it...it isn't false contentReply

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sayyid. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please provide citations/references to support your edit. Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 19:07, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2014

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sayyid. Please add matter based on reliable & verifiable sources and avoid any Original Research. Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 19:18, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 19:51, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

And don't change other editors' comments: if you do that again, you may be blocked for disruptive editing. Acroterion (talk) 20:14, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Kinu t/c 20:20, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gzsk101 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm new to Wikipedia I am just learning about how it works I sincerely apologise about editing that I never knew it was forbidden. Also I've been adding content to a page, yet being criticised of vandalism when I'm just adding factual knowledge to the page which is missing. It is therefore unfair to block me I haven't even done anything wrong!! Gzsk101 (talk) 20:28, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You were amply warned. You removed a request for page protection, then you altered the request while leaving a deceptive edit summary. You most certainly have done something wrong. Acroterion (talk) 20:37, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lol Wikipedia is full of weirdos :/. 'Deceptive edit summary', you make me out to be some mastermind with an evil master plan... -_-

Changing another user's edit from "indefinite" to "temporary" while claiming that you "fixed typo sorry I'm just experimenting" is deceptive and can result in blocking. We take these things seriously, even if you don't. Acroterion (talk) 21:14, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wait do you admins get to read that too?! Is this your job btw?!